The overlap between viewing child sexual abuse material and fringe or radical content online

Person with hood over head on laptop in the dark
Abstract

Drawing on a survey of 13,302 online Australians, this study examines the characteristics and behaviours of respondents who viewed child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and fringe or radical content online, or both.

In the past 12 months, 40.6 percent of respondents had viewed fringe or radical content and 4.5 percent had viewed CSAM. Among respondents who viewed CSAM, 64.7 percent had also viewed fringe or radical content, while 7.1 percent of those who viewed radical content had also viewed CSAM.

Respondents who viewed only CSAM or only fringe or radical content were similar to one another. Respondents who viewed both were more likely to be younger and male and had higher rates of criminal justice system contact and diagnosed mental illness. Their online activity, including the platforms used, also differed.

References

URLs correct as at September 2024

Argentino MA, Barrett G & Tyler MB 2024. 764: The intersection of terrorism, violent extremism, and child sexual exploitation. Global Network on Extremism & Technology: Washington. https://gnet-research.org/2024/01/19/764-the-intersection-of-terrorism-violent-extremism-and-child-sexual-exploitation/

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2023. National, state and territory population, September 2022. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/national-state-and-territory-population/sep-2022

Australian Security Intelligence Organisation 2023. Director-General’s Annual Threat Assessment 2023. https://www.asio.gov.au/director-generals-annual-threat-assessment-2023

Balfe M, Gallagher B, Masson H, Balfe S, Brugha R & Hackett S 2015. Internet child sex offenders’ concerns about online security and their use of identity protection technologies: A review. Child Abuse Review 24(6): 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2308

Broadhurst R 2019. Child sex abuse images and exploitation materials. In R Leukfeldt & T Holt (eds), Cybercrime: The human factor. Routledge: 310–336. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429460593-14

Broadhurst R, Woodford-Smith H, Maxim D, Sabol B, Orlando S, Chapman-Smith B & Alazab M 2017. Cyber terrorism: Research review. Canberra: Australian National University, Cybercrime Observatory. https://csrm.cass.anu.edu.au/research/publications/cyber-terrorism-research-report-australian-national-university-cybercrime

Brown R 2023. Prevalence of viewing online child sexual abuse material among Australian adults. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 682. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti77239

Brown R 2022. Eliminating online child sexual abuse material. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003327264

Bursztein E, Clarke E, DeLaune M, Eliff DM, Hsu N, Olson L, Shehan J, Thakur M, Thomas K & Bright T 2019. Rethinking the detection of child sexual abuse imagery on the internet. Paper presented at the World Wide Web Conference, San Francisco, CA: 2601–2607

Cubitt T & Morgan A 2024. Exposure to and sharing of fringe or radical content online. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 705. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti77734

Droogan J & Waldek L 2018. Should we be afraid of cyber-terrorism? International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics 10(3): 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESDF.2018.093017

Federal Bureau of Investigation 2023. Violent online groups extort minors to self-harm and produce child sexual abuse material. Public Service Announcement Alert Number I-091223-PSA. https://www.ic3.gov/Media/Y2023/PSA230912

Froio C & Ganesh B 2019. The transnationalisation of far right discourse on Twitter. European Societies 21(4): 513–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1494295

Gill P, Corner E, Conway M, Thornton A, Bloom M & Horgan J 2017. Terrorist use of the internet by the numbers: Quantifying behaviors, patterns, and processes. Criminology & Public Policy 16(1): 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12249

Hamid N & Ariza C 2022. Offline versus online radicalization: Which is the bigger threat? Tracing outcomes of 439 jihadist terrorists between 2014–2021 in 8 Western countries. Global Network on Extremism and Technology. https://gnet-research.org/2022/02/21/offline-versus-online-radicalisation-which-is-the-bigger-threat/

Hassan G et al. 2018. Exposure to extremist online content could lead to violent radicalization: A systematic review of empirical evidence. International Journal of Developmental Science 12(1–2): 71–88. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-170233

Holt TJ, Cale J, Leclerc B & Drew J 2020. Assessing the challenges affecting the investigative methods to combat online child exploitation material offenses. Aggression and Violent Behavior 55: 101464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101464

Hunn C, Watters P, Prichard J, Wortley R, Scanlan J, Spiranovic C & Krone T 2023. How to implement online warnings to prevent the use of child sexual abuse material. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 669. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78894

Jasser C, McSwiney J, Pertwee E & Zannettou S 2023. ‘Welcome to the #GabFam’: Far-right virtual community on Gab. New Media & Society 25(7): 1728–1745. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211024546

Johnson B & Patel P 2019. Multi-million pound funding to protect child abuse victims and track down offenders. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/multi-million-pound-funding-to-protect-child-abuse-victims-and-track-down-offenders

Kenyon J, Binder JF & Baker‐Beall C 2023. Online radicalization: Profile and risk analysis of individuals convicted of extremist offences. Legal and Criminological Psychology 28(1): 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12218

Morgan S & Lambie I 2019. Understanding men who access sexualised images of children: Exploratory interviews with offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression 25(1): 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2018.1551502

Ngo VM, Gajula R, Thorpe C & Mckeever S 2024. Discovering child abuse material creators’ behaviors and preferences on the dark web. Child Abuse & Neglect 147: 106558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106558

Nienierza A, Reinemann C, Fawzi N, Riesmeyer C & Neumann K. 2021. Too dark to see? Explaining adolescents’ contact with online extremism and their ability to recognize it. Information, Communication & Society 24(9): 1229–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1697339

Nuraniyah N 2018. Not just brainwashed: Understanding the radicalization of Indonesian female supporters of the Islamic State. Terrorism and Political Violence 30(6): 890–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1481269

Rao JNK & Scott AJ 1984. On chi-squared tests for multiway tables with cell proportions estimated from survey data. Annals of Statistics 12: 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176346391

Rao JNK & Scott AJ 1981. The analysis of categorical data from complex sample surveys: Chi-squared tests for goodness-of-fit and independence in two-way tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76: 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1981.10477633

Salter M & Sokolov S 2024. “Talk to strangers!” Omegle and the political economy of technologically-facilitated child sexual exploitation. Journal of Criminology 57(1): 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076231194451

Salter M, Woodlock D, Whitten T, Tyler M, Naldrett G, Breckenridge J, Nolan J, Peleg N 2023. Identifying and understanding child sexual offending behaviours and attitudes among Australian men. Sydney: University of New South Wales. https://www.humanrights.unsw.edu.au/news/worlds-largest-child-sexual-abuse-perpetration-prevalence-study-recommends-significant-investment-early-intervention-measures

Seto MC & Ahmed AG 2014. Treatment and management of child pornography use. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 37(2): 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2014.03.004

Vergani M, Arranz AM, Scrivens R & Orellana L 2022. Hate speech in a Telegram conspiracy channel during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Media + Society 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221138758

WePROTECT Global Alliance 2021. Global threat assessment 2021: Working together to end the sexual abuse of children online. https://www.weprotect.org/global-threat-assessment-21/#report

Westlake B 2020. The past, present, and future of online child sexual exploitation: Summarizing the evolution of production, distribution, and detection. In T Holt & A Bossler (eds), The Palgrave handbook of international cybercrime and cyberdeviance. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan: 1225–1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78440-3_52

Wolak J, Liberatore M & Levine BN 2014. Measuring a year of child pornography trafficking by US computers on a peer-to-peer network. Child Abuse & Neglect 38(2): 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.10.018

Wolbers H, Dowling C, Cubitt T & Kuhn C 2023. Understanding and preventing internet facilitated radicalisation. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 673. Canberra: Australian institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti77024

Wolfowicz M, Hasisi B & Weisburd D 2022. What are the effects of different elements of media on radicalization outcomes? A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews 18(2): e1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1244

Wortley R & Smallbone S 2012. Internet child pornography: Causes, investigation, and prevention. Global crime and justice series. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger