Routine online activities and vulnerability to dating app facilitated sexual violence

Person clicking like icon on a mobile phone
Abstract

This study examines factors associated with dating app facilitated sexual violence (DAFSV) among a large, nationally representative sample of dating app or website users (n=9,987).

Through the lens of routine activity theory, we examined the way in which respondents used dating platforms and how this was associated with experiences of DAFSV.

Prolific dating platform users and those who share more information, who chat with people on different platforms or who paid for an online dating service were more likely to report experiencing DAFSV. Risk factors for DAFSV extending from the online sphere into the physical world were also explored.

Findings give much needed context for experiences of DAFSV and provide direction for responses aimed at protecting individuals from harm facilitated by online dating platforms.

References

URLs correct as at July 2024

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2017. Personal safety, Australia. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/personal-safety-australia/2016

Bumble 2022. What is Travel and how does it work? https://bumble.com/help/what-is-travel

Bumble 2021. What is Incognito mode? https://bumble.com/help/what-is-incognito-mode

Business of Apps 2024. Dating app revenue and usage statistics (2024). https://www.businessofapps.com/data/dating-app-market/

Centelles V 2019. Dating application facilitated victimization: An examination of lifestyle-routine activities, self-control, and self-efficacy (Master’s thesis). University of South Florida, Florida, USA. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/7764

Cohen L & Felson M 1979. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44(4): 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589

Echevarria SG, Peterson R & Woerner J 2023. College students’ experiences of dating app facilitated sexual violence and associations with mental health symptoms and well-being. Journal of Sex Research 60(8): 1193–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2130858

Gewirtz-Meydan A, Volman-Pampanel D, Opuda E & Tarshish N 2024. Dating apps: A new emerging platform for sexual harassment? A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 25(1): 752–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231162969

Gillett R 2023. ‘This is not a nice safe space’: Investigating women’s safety work on Tinder. Feminist Media Studies 23(1): 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1948884

Hanrahan C 2019. More people now meet their partner online than through friends or work combined. ABC News, 26 Nov. https://abc.net.au/news/2019-11-26/australia-talks-national-survey-where-to-find-a-partner/11692170

Lawler S & Boxall H 2024. User experiences of reporting dating app facilitated sexual violence to dating platforms. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 688. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti77314

Lawler S & Boxall H 2023. Reporting of dating app facilitated sexual violence to the police: Victim-survivor experiences and outcomes. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 662. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78887

Leukfeldt ER & Yar M 2016. Applying routine activity theory to cybercrime: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Deviant Behavior 37(3): 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2015.1012409

Marcum CD, Ricketts ML & Higgins GE 2010. Assessing sex experiences of online victimization: An examination of adolescent online behaviors using routine activity theory. Criminal Justice Review 35(4): 412–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016809360331

Miró F 2014. Routine activity theory. In JM Miller (ed), The encyclopedia of theoretical criminology. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118517390.wbetc198

Miró Llinares F & Johnson SD 2018. Cybercrime and place: Applying environmental criminology to crimes in cyberspace. In GJN Bruinsma & SD Johnson (eds), The Oxford handbook of environmental criminology. Oxford Handbooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190279707.013.39

Office of the eSafety Commissioner 2023a. Online dating. https://www.esafety.gov.au/key-topics/staying-safe/online-dating

Office of the eSafety Commissioner 2023b. Technology-facilitated abuse: Family, domestic and sexual violence. https://www.esafety.gov.au/research/literature-scan-of-tech-based-family-domestic-and-sexual-violence

Perez-Trujillo M, Reyes MF, Cabrera L & Gomez AP 2016. Changing the beat: Fostering the prevention of alcohol-related violence in nighttime leisure zones. International Criminal Justice Review 26(2): 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567716639097

Stardust Z, Gillett R & Albury K 2023. Surveillance does not equal safety: Police, data and consent on dating apps. Crime, Media, Culture 19(2): 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590221111827

Teunissen C, Boxall H, Napier S & Brown R 2022. The sexual exploitation of Australian children on dating apps and websites. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 658. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78757

Tinder 2020. Tinder introduces safety-focused updates. https://blog.gotinder.com/tinder-introduces-safety-updates/

Wolbers H & Boxall H 2024. Online dating app-facilitated sexual violence victimisation among people with disability. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 695. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti77468

Wolbers H, Boxall H, Long C & Gunnoo A 2022. Sexual harassment, aggression and violence victimisation among mobile dating app and website users in Australia. Research Report no. 25. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/rr78740