Sexual exploitation of children on dating platforms and experiences of revictimisation as an adult

Child  on phone
Abstract

This study examined the sexual exploitation of children on dating apps, and their revictimisation as adults. Findings showed that, from a sample of 9,987 Australian dating platform users surveyed, 8.8 percent had used these platforms while under 18 years of age. Of these, 59.3 percent reported receiving at least one sexually exploitative request from another dating platform user who knew they were under 18. 

Respondents who were victimised on dating platforms while under 18 were more likely to be revictimised as an adult through online and offline sexual violence. They also experienced a greater number of harms. These findings highlight the risks associated with underage dating platform use, the potential for revictimisation as an adult, and the need for these platforms to implement additional safety measures to reduce access among children and adolescents.

References

URLs correct as at April 2024

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2021. Sexual violence – victimisation. Canberra: ABS. https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/sexual-violence-victimisation

Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) 2021. Age of consent laws in Australia. https://aifs.gov.au/resources/resource-sheets/age-consent-laws-australia

Brewer R, Cale J, Goldsmith A & Holt T 2018. Young people, the internet, and emerging pathways into criminality: A study amongst a cohort of Australian adolescents. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 12(1): 115­–132

Brown R 2023. Prevalence of viewing online child sexual abuse material among Australian adults. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 682. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti77239

Brown R 2022. Eliminating online child sexual abuse material. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003327264

Chen LP et al. 2010. Sexual abuse and lifetime diagnosis of psychiatric disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clinic proceedings 85(7): 618–629. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2009.0583

eSafety Commissioner 2022. Mind the gap: Parental awareness of children’s exposure to risks online. https://www.esafety.gov.au/research/mind-gap

Finkelhor D, Turner H & Colburn D 2022. Prevalence of online sexual offenses against children in the US. JAMA Network Open 5(10). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34471

Fletcher K 2021. A systematic review of the relationship between child sexual abuse and substance use issues. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 30(3): 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2020.1801937

Flynn A, Wheildon L, Robards B, Vakhitova Z & Harris B 2023. Australian users’ experiences with control features on social media services and online dating apps: Key findings. Research Report, Monash University. https://doi.org/10.26180/24844272.v1

Gibbs JL, Ellison NB & Lai C 2011. First comes love, then comes google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research 38(1): 70–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210377091

Gillett R 2023. ‘This is not a nice safe space’: Investigating women’s safety work on Tinder. Feminist Media Studies 23(1): 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1948884

Grindr nd. Terms of service. https://www.grindr.com/terms-of-service/

Hart TA 2023. Underaged & digitally engaged: Adolescent use of adult-based platforms (doctoral thesis). Adelaide: Flinders University

Huang TF et al. 2023. Adolescent use of dating applications and the associations with online victimization and psychological distress. Behavioral Sciences 13(11): 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110903

Joleby M, Lunde C, Landstrӧm S & Jonsson LS 2021. Offender strategies for engaging children in online sexual activity. Child Abuse & Neglect 120: 105214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105214

Lee KS 2023. Examining safety and inclusive interventions on dating apps by adopting responsible social media guidelines. International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good (GoodIT’23). Lisbon, Portugal: ACM: 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582515.3609579

Mathews B et al. 2023. The prevalence of child maltreatment: Findings from a national survey. Medical Journal of Australia 218(S6): S13–S18. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.51873

Murphy A 2018. Dating dangerously: Risks lurking within mobile dating apps. Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology 26(1): 100–126. https://scholarship.law.edu/jlt/vol26/iss1/7

Napier S, Teunissen C & Boxall H 2021. Live streaming of child sexual abuse: An analysis of offender chat logs. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 639. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78375

Online Personals Watch 2020. Matchmaker.com Acquired – History. https://www.onlinepersonalswatch.com/news/2020/09/matchmakercom-acquired-history.html

Papalia N, Mann E & Ogloff J 2021. Child sexual abuse and risk of revictimization: Impact of child demographics, sexual abuse characteristics, and psychiatric disorders. Child Maltreatment 26(1): 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559520932665

Pittenger SL, Huit TZ & Hansen DJ 2016. Applying ecological systems theory to sexual revictimization of youth: A review with implications for research and practice. Aggression and Violent Behaviour 26: 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.11.005

Putnam FW 2003. Ten-year research update review: child sexual abuse. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 42(3): 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200303000-00006

Robinson M 2016. Tinder bans under 18s from using its dating app after it was revealed children as young as thirteen were being groomed by adults online. Daily Mail Australia, 10 June. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3633341/Tinder-bans-18s-using-dating-app-revealed-17-year-olds-able-use-hook-children-young-13.html

Scoglio AAJ, Kraus SW, Saczynski J, Jooma S & Molnar BE 2021. Systematic review of risk factors and protective factors for revictimisation after child sexual abuse. Trauma, Violence & Abuse 22(1): 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018823274

Stoltenborgh M, van Ijzendoorn MH, Euser EM & Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ 2011. A global perspective on child sexual abuse: meta-analysis of prevalence around the world. Child Maltreatment 16(2): 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559511403920

Teunissen C, Boxall H, Napier S & Brown R 2022. The sexual exploitation of Australian children on dating apps and websites. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 658. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78757

Teunissen C, Thomsen D, Napier S & Boxall H 2024. Risk factors for receiving requests to facilitate child sexual exploitation and abuse on dating apps and websites. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 686. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti77291

Thorn 2021. Responding to online threats: Minors’ perspective on disclosing, reporting, and blocking. Los Angeles: Thorn. https://www.thorn.org/research/library/

Tinder nd. What is the minimum age requirement? https://www.help.tinder.com/hc/en-us/articles/115004647686-Tinder-Overview

Tinder 2023. Tinder announces ID verification pilot in Australia and New Zealand. https://au.tinderpressroom.com/news?item=122572

Wolbers H, Boxall, Long C & Gunnoo A 2022. Sexual harassment, aggression and violence victimisation among mobile dating app and website users in Australia. Research Report no. 25. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/rr78740