This study examines the prevalence of requests for facilitated child sexual exploitation (CSE) online. Of 4,011 Australians surveyed, 2.8 percent had received a request for facilitated CSE in the past year. Requests for facilitated CSE were significantly higher among those who had shared a photo of or information about children publicly online. Among respondents who had shared publicly, requests for facilitated CSE were significantly higher among men, younger individuals, linguistically diverse individuals, individuals with disability, and those who had experienced other sexual or violent harms online. The results highlight the need for increased awareness of the potential harms of posting photos of and information about children publicly online, and place onus on platforms to warn users of these potential harms.
References
URLs correct as at February 2024
Amon MJ, Kartvelishvili N, Bertenthal BI, Hugenberg K & Kapadia A 2022. Sharenting and children’s privacy in the United States: Parenting style, practices, and perspectives on sharing young children’s photos on social media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6: 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512963
Auxier B, Anderson M, Perrin A & Turner E 2020. 4. Parents’ attitudes – and experiences – related to digital technology. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/07/28/parents-attitudes-and-experiences-related-to-digital-technology/
Bartholomew MK, Schoppe‐Sullivan SJ, Glassman M, Kamp Dush CM & Sullivan JM 2012. New parents’ Facebook use at the transition to parenthood. Family Relations 61(3): 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00708.x
Briazu RA, Floccia C & Hanoch Y 2021. Facebook sharenting in mothers of young children: The risks are worth it but only for some. Technology, Mind, and Behavior 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000051
Canadian Centre for Child Protection (CCCP) 2017. Survivors’ survey: Executive summary. Winnipeg: CCCP. https://protectchildren.ca/en/resources-research/survivors-survey-results/
Lavorgna A, Tartari M & Ugwudike P 2022. Criminogenic and harm-enabling features of social media platforms: The case of sharenting practices. European Journal of Criminology 20(3): 1037–1060. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708221131659
Napier S, Teunissen C & Boxall H 2021. How do child sexual abuse live streaming offenders access victims? Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 642. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78474
Ní Bhroin N et al. 2022. The privacy paradox by proxy: Considering predictors of sharenting. Media and Communication 10(1): 371–383. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4858
Prichard J et al. 2022. Warning messages to prevent illegal sharing of sexual images: Results of a randomised controlled experiment. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 647. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78559
Quayle E, Allegro S, Hutton L, Sheath M & Lööf L 2014. Rapid skill acquisition and online sexual grooming of children. Computers in Human Behavior 39: 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.005
Romero-Rodríguez JM, Kopecký K, García-González A & Gómez-García G 2022. Sharing images or videos of minors online: Validation of the Sharenting Evaluation Scale (SES). Children and Youth Services Review 136: 106396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106396
Salter M et al. 2021. Production and distribution of child sexual abuse material by parental figures. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 616. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti04916
Seto MC, Buckman C, Dwyer RG & Quayle E 2018. Production and active trading of child sexual exploitation images depicting identified victims. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children & Thorn
Steinberg SB 2017. Sharenting: Children’s privacy in the age of social media. Emory Law Journal 66(4): 839–884
Teunissen C, Boxall H, Napier S & Brown R 2022. The sexual exploitation of Australia children on dating apps and websites. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 658. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78757
Teunissen C & Napier S 2022. Child sexual abuse material and end-to-end encryption on social media platforms: An overview. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 653. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78634
Teunissen C, Thomsen D, Napier S & Boxall H 2024. Risk factors for receiving requests to facilitate child sexual exploitation and abuse on dating apps and websites. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 686. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti77291
TransHub 2021. Trans Mob. https://www.transhub.org.au/trans-mob?rq=sistergirl
WeProtect Global Alliance 2021. Global threat assessment 2021. https://www.weprotect.org/global-threat-assessment-21/
Whittle HC, Hamilton-Giachritsis C, Beech A & Collings G 2013. A review of online grooming: Characteristics and concerns. Aggression and Violent Behavior 18: 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.09.003
Williams-Ceci S, Grose GE, Pinch AC, Kizilcec RF & Lewis Jr NA 2021. Combating sharenting: Interventions to alter parents’ attitudes toward posting about their children online. Computers in Human Behavior 125: 106939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106939
Winters GM, Kaylor LE & Jeglic EL 2017. Sexual offenders contacting children online: An examination of transcripts of sexual grooming. Journal of Sexual Aggression 23(1): 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1271146