How police body-worn cameras can facilitate misidentification in domestic and family violence responses

Body-worn camera on police officer
Abstract

Police body-worn camera (BWC) technologies—affixed to a vest, sunglasses or cap—are deployed by all Australian police agencies, including in frontline responses to domestic and family violence (DFV). This paper presents the findings from the first Australian study focused on how women DFV victim-survivors view and experience BWCs in police call-outs and legal proceedings. Informed by a national survey of 119 victim-survivors, it explores two key concerns relating to the potential consequences of BWC footage: (1) it may facilitate misidentification of the primary aggressor, and (2) perpetrators may use the BWC to present (false) evidence of themselves as blameless.

References

Ask K 2010. A survey of police officers’ and prosecutors’ beliefs about crime victim behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 25(6): 1132–1149

Axon 2017. Fighting domestic violence with body-worn cameras: Queensland Police Service case study. Scottsdale, AZ: Axon

Bancroft L 2002. The parenting of men who batter. Court Review 36(2): 44–49

Bollingmo GC, Wessel EO, Eilertsen DE & Magnussen S 2008. Credibility of the emotional witness: A study of ratings by police investigators. Psychology, Crime & Law 14(1): 29–40

Carmody M & Carrington K 2000. Preventing sexual violence? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 33(3): 341–361

Clare J, Henstock D, McComb C, Newland R & Barnes GC 2021. The results of a randomized controlled trial of police body-worn video in Australia. Journal of Experimental Criminology 17: 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09387-w

Corrigan FM, Fisher JJ & Nutt DJ 2011. Autonomic dysregulation and the window of tolerance model of the effects of complex emotional trauma. Journal of Psychopharmacology 25(1): 17–25

Dichter ME 2013. ‘They arrested me—and I was the victim’: Women’s experiences with getting arrested in the context of domestic violence. Women and Criminal Justice 23(2): 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2013.759068

Ferguson C 2021. Detection avoidance in homicide: Debates, explanations and responses. London: Routledge

Franklin CA, Garza AD, Goodson A & Bouffard LA 2020. Police perceptions of crime victim behaviors: A trend analysis exploring mandatory training and knowledge of sexual and domestic violence survivors’ trauma responses. Crime & Delinquency 66(8): 1055–1086

Goodmark L 2021. Gender-based violence, law reform and the criminalisation of survivors of violence. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 10(4): 13–25

Harris B 2020. Visualising violence? Capturing and critiquing body-worn video camera evidence of domestic and family violence. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 32(4): 382–402

Harris B & Woodlock D 2022. Spaceless violence: Women’s experiences of technology-facilitated domestic violence in regional, rural and remote areas. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 644. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78405

Hester M 2012. Portrayal of women as intimate partner domestic violence perpetrators. Violence Against Women 18(9): 1067–1082

Iliadis M, Harris B, Zakhitova Z, Woodlock D, Flynn A & Tyson D 2024. Police body-worn camera technologies in responses to domestic and family violence: A national study of victim-survivor perspectives and experiences. Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/crg77260

Iliadis M, Vakhitova Z, Harris B, Tyson D & Flynn A 2022. Police body-worn cameras in response to domestic and family violence: A study of police perceptions and experiences. In A Powell, A Flynn & L Sugiura L (eds), The Palgrave handbook of gendered violence and technology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

Iliadis M, Vakhitova Z, Harris B, Flynn A & Tyson D 2023. Police body-worn cameras as a response to domestic and family violence: Domestic and family violence practitioner insights into the consequences for victim-survivors. Violence Against Women. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231185541

Johnson MP 2010. A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. New Hampshire: Northeastern University Press

Katz CM, Choate DE, Ready JR & Nuño L 2014. Evaluating the impact of officer worn body worn cameras in the Phoenix Police Department. Phoenix: Centre for Violence Prevention & Community Safety, Arizona State University

King N, Horrocks C & Brooks J 2019. Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage

Larance LY & Miller SL 2017. In her own words: Women describe their use of force resulting in court-ordered intervention. Violence Against Women 23(12): 1536–1559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216662340

Lum C, Koper SC, Wilson BD, Stoltz M, Goodier M, Eggins E, Higginson A & Mazerolle L 2020. Body-worn cameras’ effects on police officers’ and citizens’ behaviour: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews: 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1112

McCulloch J, Pfitzner N, Maher JM, Fitz-Gibbon K & Segrave M 2020. Victoria Police trial of digitally recorded evidence in chief: Family violence. Final evaluation report. https://www.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-10/Victoria Police trial of digitally recorded evidence.pdf

Miller SL 2005. One size fits all? A gender-neutral approach to a gender-specific problem: Contrasting batterer treatment programs for male and female offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review 16(3): 336–359

Miranda D 2021. Body worn cameras ‘on the move’: Exploring the contextual, technical and ethical challenges in policing practice. Policing and Society 31(1): 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2021.1879074

Morrow WJ, Katz CM & Choate DE 2016. Assessing the impact of police body-worn cameras on arresting, prosecuting, and convicting suspects of intimate partner violence. Police Quarterly 19(3): 303–325

Nancarrow H, Thomas, K & Ringland V 2020. Accurately identifying the person most in need of protection. Research Report 23/2020. Sydney: ANROWS

O’Dell A 2007. Why do police arrest victims of domestic violence? The need for comprehensive training and investigative protocols. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 15(3–4): 53–73

Owens C, Mann D & Mckenna R 2014. The Essex body worn video trial: The impact of body worn video on criminal justice outcomes of domestic abuse incidents. Essex: College of Policing. https://bapcojournal.com/the-essex-body-worn-video-trial-the-impact-of-body-worn-video-on-criminal-justice-outcomes-of-domestic-abuse-incidents/

Procopis B 2018. Captured at the scene: A proposal for the admissibility of visually recorded scene statements from domestic violence complainants in Western Australia (Honours thesis). Edith Cowan University, Western Australia. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/1523/

Queensland Police Service 2015. Body worn camera roll out for Gold Coast. Queensland Police News. https://mypolice.qld.gov.au/news/2015/11/11/body-worn-camera-roll-out-for-gold-coast/

R Core Team 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Reeves E 2021. ‘I’m not at all protected and I think other women should know that, that they’re not protected either’: Victim-survivors’ experiences of ‘misidentification’ in Victoria’s family violence system. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 10(4): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.1992

Rose MR, Nadler J & Clark J (2006). Appropriately upset? Emotion norms and perceptions of crime victims. Law and Human Behavior 30(2): 203–219

Royal Commission into Family Violence 2016. Report and recommendations: Volume III. Melbourne

RStudio Team 2020. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC http://www.rstudio.com/

Salter M, Conroy E, Dragiewicz M, Burke J, Ussher J, Middleton W … & Noack-Lundberg K 2020. ‘A deep wound under my heart’: Constructions of complex trauma and implications for women’s wellbeing and safety from violence. Research report 12/2020. Sydney: ANROWS

Simpson H 2021. Under Justitia’s lens: The efficacy of NSW Police Force audio-visual evidentiary statements for domestic violence matters. University of Wollongong Thesis Collection. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1/1218/

Tasmania Police 2018. Body-worn cameras. Department of Police, Fire and Emergency Management. https://www.police.tas.gov.au/about-us/body-worn-cameras/

Vakhitova Z, Iliadis M, Harris B, Tyson D & Flynn A 2022. The merits and risks of body-worn camera footage in domestic and family violence incidents and legal proceedings: A study of police perceptions and experiences. Policing & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2022.2082421