Trialling a nature-based intervention with men who perpetrate domestic and family violence

Looking up into the tree tops
Abstract

Evidence for nature-based interventions reducing recidivism among offenders is growing. Nature-based interventions have yet to be trialled with men who have perpetrated domestic violence.

This study aimed to develop, pilot, test and refine an innovative program that incorporates an integrated approach and includes community restitution through an environmental project that operated in parallel to a traditional men’s behaviour change program. Data were collected pre and post intervention with men, practitioners, volunteers and (ex)partners.

Study results indicate initial positive trends in improving men’s wellbeing and engagement, but further research is needed to determine impacts on behaviour change.

References

URLs correct as at May 2023

Arias E, Arce R & Vilariño M 2013. Batterer intervention programmes: A meta-analytic review of effectiveness. Psychosocial Intervention 22(2): 153–160. https://doi.org/10.5093/in2013a18

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2019. Family, domestic and sexual violence in Australia: Continuing the national story. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. https://doi.org/10.25816/5ebcc837fa7ea

Babcock J, Green C & Robie C 2004. Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review 23(8): 1023–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001

Baybutt M, Dooris M & Farrier A 2019. Growing health in UK prison settings. Health Promotion International 34(4): 792–802. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/day037

Bratman G, Hamilton J, Hahn K, Daily G & Gross J 2015. Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112(28): 8567–8572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510459112

Brown G, Bos E, Kneafsy M & Glynn M 2016. A summary report of an evaluation of the Master Gardener Program at HMP Rye Hill: An horticultural intervention with substance misusing offenders. Coventry: Coventry University. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3948.5602

Caprara G, Steca P, Zelli A & Capanna C 2005. A new scale for measuring adults’ prosociality. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 21(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.77

Feder L & Wilson D 2005. A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers’ behavior? Journal of Experimental Criminology 1(2): 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-1179-0

Folk J, Mashek D, Tangney J, Stuewig J & Moore K 2016. Connectedness to the criminal community and the community at large predicts 1-year post-release outcomes among felony offenders. European Journal of Social Psychology 46(3): 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2155

Goldberg D 1978. Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson

Gondolf E 2004. Evaluating batterer counseling programs: A difficult task showing some effects and implication. Aggression and Violent Behavior 9(6): 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.06.001

Kaye T, Bush K, Naugle C & LeRoy CJ 2015. Conservation projects in prison: The case for engaging incarcerated populations in conservation and science. Natural Areas Journal 35(1): 90–97. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.035.0113

Lee A, Kim S, Kwon H & Park S 2021. Horticultural therapy program for mental health of prisoners: Case report. Integrative Medicine Research 10(2): 100495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100495

Martín-Fernández M et al. 2018. Measuring acceptability of intimate partner violence against women: Development and validation of the A-IPVAW Scale. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context 10(1): 26–34. https://doi.org/ 10.5093/ejpalc2018a3

Moran D 2019. Back to nature? Attention restoration theory and the restorative effects of nature contact in prison. Health and Place 57: 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.03.005

State of Victoria 2016. Royal Commission into Family Violence: Summary and recommendations. Melbourne: Victorian Government. https://www.rcfv.com.au/Report-Recommendations

Straus M & Douglas E 2004. A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality. Violence and Victims 19(5): 507–520. https://doi.org/ 10.1891/vivi.19.5.507.63686

Timler K, Brown H & Varcoe C 2019. Growing connection beyond prison walls: How a prison garden fosters rehabilitation and healing for incarcerated men. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 58(5): 444–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2019.1615598

Toews B, Wagenfeld A & Stevens J 2018. Impact of a nature-based intervention on incarcerated women. International Journal of Prisoner Health 14(4): 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-12-2017-0065

van der Linden S 2015. Green prison programmes, recidivism and mental health: A primer. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 25(5): 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1978

Women’s Safety and Justice Taskforce 2021. Hear her voice, Report one: Addressing coercive control and domestic and family violence in Queensland. Brisbane, Queensland: Women’s Safety and Justice Taskforce. https://www.womenstaskforce.qld.gov.au/publications

Zelenski J, Dopko R & Capaldi C 2015. Cooperation is in our nature: Nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 42: 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.005