This study analysed chat logs obtained for seven offenders who committed 145 child sexual abuse (CSA) live streaming offences against 74 victims. The study found that offenders accessed victims online or by forming relationships with Filipino locals during trips to the Philippines, which would then move online and lead to CSA live streaming. A facilitator was involved in approximately 35 percent of offences. Facilitators were often female family members of victims (eg mothers and sisters). Some facilitators appeared to have experienced child sexual abuse as well.
Although some offenders intentionally targeted children, it was also common for offenders to receive unsolicited offers of CSA live streaming from facilitators and victims. This suggests that some CSA live streaming offenders are ‘opportunistic’, and may be responsive to situational crime prevention and primary prevention measures such as messaging campaigns and online warning messages posted on specific sites where victims are targeted.
References
URLs correct as at October 2021
Black PJ, Wollis M, Woodworth M & Hancock JT 2015. A linguistic analysis of grooming strategies of online child sex offenders: Implications for our understanding of predatory sexual behavior in an increasingly computer-mediated world. Child Abuse & Neglect 44: 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.12.004
Brown A 2016. Safe from harm: Tackling webcam child sexual abuse in the Philippines: Challenges protecting vulnerable children and prosecuting their abusers. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/stories/safe-from-harm-tackling-webcam-child-sexual-abuse-philippines
Brown R, Napier S & Smith RG 2020. Australians who view live streaming of child sexual abuse: An analysis of financial transactions. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 589. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti04336
Bursztein E et al. 2019. Rethinking the detection of child sexual abuse imagery on the internet. World Wide Web Conference Committee, May 2019. pp 2601–2607. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313482
Cantón-Cortés D, Cortés MR & Cantón J 2020. Child sexual abuse and suicidal ideation: The differential role of attachment and emotional security in the family system. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(9): 3613. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093163
Charmaz K & Belgrave L 2012. Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J Gubrium, J Holstein, A Marvasti & K McKinney (eds), The Sage handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage: 347–365
Cubitt T, Napier S & Brown R 2021. Predicting prolific live streaming of child sexual abuse. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 634. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78320
DeHart D, Dwyer G, Seto MC, Moran R, Letourneau E & Schwarz-Watts D 2017. Internet sexual solicitation of children: A proposed typology of offenders based on their chats, e-mails, and social network posts. Journal of Sexual Aggression 23(1): 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1241309
Dushi D 2020. Combating the live-streaming of child sexual abuse and sexual exploitation: A need for new legislation. In J Hunsinger, M Allen, L Klastrup (eds), Second international handbook of internet research. Dordrecht: Springer: 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1555-1_43
ECPAT International 2017. Online child sexual exploitation: An analysis of emerging and selected issues. ECPAT International Journal 12: 1–63
Glaser B 1978. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press
Halsey M & Deegan S 2012. Father and son: Two generations through prison. Punishment & Society 14(3): 338–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474512442315
International Justice Mission 2020. Online sexual exploitation of children in the Philippines: Analysis and recommendations for governments, industry and civil society. Arlington, VA: International Justice Mission. https://www.ijm.org/vawc/blog/osec-study
Kloess JA, Hamilton-Giachritsis CE & Beech AR 2019. Offense processes of online sexual grooming and abuse of children via internet communication platforms. Sexual abuse: A journal of research and treatment 31(1): 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217720927
Kloess JA, Seymour-Smith S, Hamilton-Giachritsis CE, Long ML, Shipley D & Beech AR 2017. A qualitative analysis of offenders’ modus operandi in sexually exploitative interactions with children online. Sexual Abuse 29(6): 563–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215612442
Kuhlmann DF & Aurén S 2015. Nipa huts with high speed Internet: Commercial exploitation of children in the 21st century, a qualitative investigation of webcam child prostitution in the Philippines (Doctoral thesis). Lund University, Sweden. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/5424968
McGrath M, Cann S & Konopasky R 1998. New measures of defensiveness, empathy, and cognitive distortions for sexual offenders against children. Sexual Abuse 10(1): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329801000104
McManus MA, Almond L, Cubbon B, Boulton L & Mears I 2016. Exploring the online communicative themes of child sex offenders. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 13(2): 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1450
Napier S, Teunissen C & Boxall H 2021. Live streaming of child sexual abuse: An analysis of offender chat logs. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 639. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78375
Netclean 2019. Netclean report 2019: A report about child sexual abuse crime. Gothenberg: Netclean. https://www.netclean.com/the-netclean-report/
Prichard J, Wortley R, Watters PA, Spiranovic C, Hunn C & Krone T 2021. Effects of automated messages on Internet users attempting to access ‘barely legal’ pornography. Sexual Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632211013809
Salter M, Wong T, Breckenridge J, Scott S, Cooper S & Peleg N 2021. Production and distribution of child sexual abuse material by parental figures. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 616. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti04916
Smallbone S & Cale J 2016. Situational theories. In DP Boer (ed), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending. New York: Wiley
Stop it Now! nd. Deterrence campaign. https://www.stopitnow.org.uk/our-impact/deterrence-campaign/
Tan L & Grace RC 2008. Social desirability and sexual offenders: A review. Sexual Abuse 20(1): 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208314820
Terre des Hommes 2014. Webcam child sex tourism: Becoming Sweetie: A novel approach to stopping the global rise of webcam child sex tourism. The Hague: Terre des Hommes. https://www.terredeshommes.org/webcam-child-sex-tourism-2/
Terre des Hommes 2013. An exploratory study on the background and psychosocial consequences of webcam child sex tourism in the Philippines. The Hague: Terre des Hommes
Thorn 2021. Why an increase in reports of CSAM is actually a good thing. Los Angeles, CA: Thorn. https://www.thorn.org/blog/why-an-increase-in-reports-of-csam-is-actually-a-good-thing/
Thornberg R & Charmaz K 2013. Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In U Flick (ed), Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis. Sage
Urquhart C 2012. Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide. Sage
Williams R, Elliott IA & Beech AR 2013. Identifying sexual grooming themes used by internet sex offenders. Deviant Behaviour 34(2): 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2012.707550
Wortley R 2012. Situational prevention of child abuse in the new technologies. In K Ribisl & E Quayle (eds), Preventing online exploitation of children. London: Routledge: 16–23
Wortley R & Smallbone S 2006. Applying situational principles to sexual offending against children. In R Wortley & S Smallbone (eds), Situational prevention of child sexual abuse. Crime prevention studies vol 19. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press