Bail practices and policy alternatives in Australia

Photo of judges gavel
Abstract

In this paper we seek to review the rapid rise in remand in custody rates in Australia. In particular, and in response, we ask and discuss three specific questions:

1. To what extent do defendants applying for bail have vulnerabilities?

2. To what extent can risk analysis tools that seek to predict breach of bail terms be relied upon?

3. To what extent can the emerging pre-trial services programs in Australia reduce remand in custody populations?

References

URLs correct as at February 2024

Allan A, Allan M, Giles M, Drake D and Froyland I 2005. An observational study of bail decision-making. Psychiatry Psychology and Law 12(2): 319–333

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2018. Criminal justice statistics 2017–18. Canberra: ABS

Bartkowiak-Théron I & Asquith N (eds) 2012. Policing vulnerability. Sydney: Federation Press

Betchel K, Holsinger A, Lownkamp C & Warren M 2017. A meta-analytic review of pretrial research: Risk assessment, bond type, and interventions. American Journal of Criminal Justice 42: 443–467

Coghlan P 2017. Bail review: Second advice to the Victorian Government. Melbourne: Victorian Government

DeMichele M, Baumgartner P & Barrick K 2019. What do criminal justice professionals think about risk assessment at pretrial? Federal Probation 83(1): 32–41

Enang I et al. 2019. Defining and assessing vulnerability within law enforcement and public health organisations: A scoping review. Health Justice 7(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331451277_Defining_and_assessing_vulnerability_within_law_enforcement
_and_public_health_organisations_A_scoping_review

Mamalian C 2011. State of the science of pretrial risk assessment. Rockville, Maryland: Pretrial Justice Institute

McMahon M 2019. No bail, more jail? Breaking the nexus between community protection and escalating pre-trial detention. Melbourne: Department of Parliamentary Services, Parliament of Victoria

New South Wales Law Reform Commission 2012. Report 133: Bail. Sydney: NSWLRC

Picard S, Rempel M, Tallon J, Adler J & Reyes N 2017. Demystifying risk assessment: Key principles and controversies. Center for Court Innovation. https://www.courtinnovation.org/publications/demystifying-risk-assessment-key-principles-and-controversies

Sarre R, King S & Bamford D 2006. Remand in custody: Critical factors and key issues. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 310. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi310

Sturz H 1963. The Manhattan Bail Project: An interim report on the use of pre-trial parole. New York University Law Review 38: 67–95

Travers M, Colvin E, Bartkowiak-Théron I, Sarre R, Day A & Bond C 2020. Bail decision-making and pre-trial services: A comparative study of magistrates courts in four Australian states. Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology https://www.aic.gov.au/crg/reports/crg-3416-17

Willis M 2017. Bail support: A review of the literature. Research Report no. 4. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rr/rr4