Three pillars—harm reduction, demand reduction and supply reduction—underpin the harm minimisation framework of Australia’s drug policy. Much of the activity undertaken by law enforcement is aimed at reducing the availability of illicit drugs and thereby increasing price and reducing demand. This article presents a contemporary, systematic review of research exploring the price elasticity of demand for illicit drugs. Overall, the results indicate that the demand for illicit drugs is, on average, weakly price inelastic—a 10 percent increase in the price of illicit drugs results in a decrease in demand of approximately nine percent. The degree of elasticity varies by drug type, with the greatest elasticity indicated, albeit on a small number of studies, for amphetamine-type substances. The international differences seen point to a need for more Australian research, ideally with robust experimental methodologies and across a range of drug types.
References
URLs correct as at February 2024
Aitken C, Moore D, Higgs P, Kelsall J & Kerger M 2002. The impact of a police crackdown on a street drug scene: Evidence from the street. International Journal of Drug Policy 13(3): 193–202
Aston E, Metrik J, Amlung M, Kahler C & MacKillop J 2016. Interrelationships between marijuana demand and discounting of delayed rewards: Convergence in behavioral economic methods. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 169(1): 141–147
Aston E, Metrik J & MacKillop J 2015. Further validation of a marijuana purchase task. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 152(1): 32–38
Bretteville-Jensen A 2006. Drug demand: Initiation, continuation and quitting. De Economist 154(4): 491–516
Bretteville‐Jensen A 1999. Gender, heroin consumption and economic behaviour. Health Economics 8(5): 379–389
Bretteville-Jensen A & Biørn E 2004. Do prices count? A micro-econometric study of illicit drug consumption based on self-reported data. Empirical Economics 29(3): 673–695
Caulkins J 2007. Price and purity analysis for illicit drug: Data and conceptual issues. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 90: S61–S68
Caulkins J 2001. Drug prices and emergency department mentions for cocaine and heroin. American Journal of Public Health 91(9): 1446–1448
Caulkins J & Pacula R 2006. Marijuana markets: Inferences from reports by the household population. Journal of Drug Issues 36(1): 173–200
Caulkins J & Reuter P 1998. What price data tell us about drug markets. Journal of Drug Issues 28(3): 593–612
Caulkins J & Reuter P 1996. The meaning and utility of drug prices. Addiction 91(9) 1261–1264
Chalmers J, Bradford D & Jones C 2010. The effect of methamphetamine and heroin price on polydrug use: A behavioural economics analysis in Sydney, Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy 21(5): 381–389
Chalmers J, Bradford D & Jones C 2009. How do methamphetamine users respond to changes in methamphetamine price? Crime and Justice Bulletin no. 134. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research
Chandra S & Swoboda A 2008. Are spatial variables important? The case of markets for multiple drugs in British Bengal. In Y Thomas, D Richardson & I Cheung (eds), Geography and drug addiction. Dordrecht: Springer: 221–242
Cohen J, Gorr W & Singh P 2003. Estimating intervention effects in varying risk settings: Do police raids reduce illegal drug dealing at nuisance bars? Criminology 41(2): 257–292
Collins R, Vincent P, Yu J, Liu L & Epstein L 2014. A behavioral economic approach to assessing demand for marijuana. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 22(3): 211–221
Davis A, Geisler K & Nichols M 2016. The price elasticity of marijuana demand: Evidence from crowd-sourced transaction data. Empirical Economics 50(4): 1171–1192
Davis R & Lurigio A 1996. Fighting back: Neighborhood antidrug strategies. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications
Department of Health 2017. National Drug Strategy 2017–2026. Canberra: Department of Health. https://www.hcasa.asn.au/documents/555-national-drug-strategy-2017-2026/file
Gallet C 2014. Can price get the monkey off our back? A meta-analysis of illicit drug demand. Health Economics 23(1): 55-68
Kerr T, Small W & Wood E 2005. The public health and social impacts of drug market enforcement: A review of the evidence. International Journal of Drug Policy 16(4): 210–220
Lakhdar C, Vaillant N & Wolff FC 2016. Price elasticity of demand for cannabis: Does potency matter? Addiction Research & Theory 24(4): 300–312
Mankiw NG 2004. Principles of macroeconomics. UK: South-Western College Publications
Mazerolle L, Soole D & Rombouts S 2007. Drug law enforcement: A review of the evaluation literature. Police Quarterly 10(2): 115–153
Nisbet C & Vakil F 1972. Some estimates of price and expenditure elasticities of demand for marijuana among UCLA students. Review of Economics and Statistics 54(4): 473–475
Olmstead T, Alessi S, Kline B, Pacula R & Petry N 2015. The price elasticity of demand for heroin: Matched longitudinal and experimental evidence. Journal of Health Economics 41(1): 59–71
Pacula R & Lundberg R 2014. Why changes in price matter when thinking about marijuana policy: A review of the literature on the elasticity of demand. Public Health Reviews 35(2): 1–18
Petry N 2001. A behavioral economic analysis of polydrug abuse in alcoholics: Asymmetrical substitution of alcohol and cocaine. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 62(1): 31–39
Piza E 2018. The effect of various police enforcement actions on violent crime: Evidence from a saturation foot-patrol intervention. Criminal Justice Policy Review 29(6–7): 611–629
Pollack H & Reuter P 2014. Does tougher enforcement make drugs more expensive? Addiction 109(12): 1959–1966
Reuter P & Kleiman MA 1986. Risks and prices: An economic analysis of drug enforcement. Crime and Justice 7(1): 289–340
Saffer H & Chaloupka F 1999. The demand for illicit drugs. Economic Inquiry 37(3): 401–411
Scott N, Caulkins J, Ritter A & Dietze P 2015. Patterns of drug preference and use among people who inject drugs in Melbourne, Australia. Addiction Research & Theory 23(6): 459–468
Shanahan M & Ritter A 2013. Confronting the challenges of conducting a CBA of cannabis policies. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 20(3): 175–183
Sumnall H, Tyler E, Wagstaff G & Cole J 2004. A behavioural economic analysis of alcohol, amphetamine, cocaine and ecstasy purchases by polysubstance misusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 76(1): 93–99
Thompson A & Koichi Y 2017. Does previous marijuana use increase the use of other drugs: An almost ideal demand system approach. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 17(3). DOI: 10.1515/bejeap-2016-0069
Vincent P, Collins L, Liu L, Yu J, De Leo J & Earleywine M 2017. The effects of perceived quality on behavioral economic demand for marijuana: A web-based experiment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 170(1): 174–180
Volkmann T, Lozada R, Anderson C, Patterson T, Vera A & Strathdee S 2011. Factors associated with drug-related harms related to policing in Tijuana, Mexico. Harm Reduction Journal 8(1): 7
Williams P, White P, Teece M & Kitto R 2001. Problem-oriented policing: Operation Mantle—a case study. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 190. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi190
Wood E et al. 2004. Displacement of Canada’s largest public illicit drug market in response to a police crackdown. CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) 170(10): 1551–1556