This study examines the impact of CCTV footage on clearance rates for crimes occurring on the rail network in New South Wales. Nearest neighbour matching was used to compare criminal matters with and without camera footage. Cases were matched on principal offence type, spatial and temporal characteristics and offence severity. Overall, 24.8 percent of matters where footage was requested were solved by police, compared with 21.0 percent of matters where footage was not requested—an 18 percent increase in clearance rates. Footage was provided to police for nine out of 10 requests and was associated with an estimated 20 percent increase in clearance rates. Results varied by offence type, with larger increases observed for theft and property damage than for assault, and for offences at night. Timely access to CCTV footage for criminal investigations is associated with increased clearance rates for crimes on the rail network.
References
URLs correct as at March 2024
Abadie A & Imbens GW 2006. Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74(1): 235–267
Apel RJ & Sweeten G 2010. Propensity score matching in criminology and criminal justice, in Piquero AR & Weisburd D (eds) Handbook of quantitative criminology. New York: Springer: 543–561
Ashby MPJ 2017. The value of CCTV surveillance cameras as an investigative tool: An empirical analysis. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research 23(3): 441–459. DOI: 10.1007/s10610-017-9341-6
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2011. Australian and New Zealand Standard Offence Classification (ANZSOC), 2011. ABS cat. no. 1234.0. Canberra: ABS. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-offence-classification-anzsoc/2011
Burrows J et al. 2005. Understanding the attrition process in volume crime investigations. Home Office Research Study no. 295. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate
Carr R 2016. Political economy and the Australian Government’s CCTV Programme: An exploration of state-sponsored street cameras and the cultivation of consent and business in local communities. Surveillance and Society 14(1): 90–112
Carr R 2014. Surveillance politics and local government: A national survey of federal funding for CCTV in Australia. Security Journal 29(4): 683–709
Dowling C, Morgan A, Gannoni A & Jorna P 2019. How do police use CCTV footage in criminal investigations? Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 575. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi575
Fairfield City Council 2002. Cabramatta TownSafe five year review. Fairfield, NSW: Fairfield City Council
Felson R 2013. What are violent offenders thinking? In Leclerc B & Wortley R (eds), Cognition and crime: Offender decision making and script analyses. UK: Routledge: 12–25
Greenwood PW & Petersilia J 1975. The criminal investigative process: Volume 1: Summary and policy implications. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation
Hulme S, Morgan A & Brown R 2015. CCTV use by local government: Findings from a national survey. Research in practice no. 40. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rip/rip40
Kindgren J & Marklund F 2014. CCTV surveillance of Stureplan and Medborgarplatsen: Interim report 2. Stockholm: Brottsförebyggande rådet (Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention)
King J, Mulligan D & Raphael S 2008. CITRIS report: The San Francisco community safety camera program. An evaluation of the effectiveness of San Francisco’s community safety cameras. Berkeley, CA: Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society, University of California
La Vigne NG, Lowry SS, Markman JA & Dwyer AM 2011. Evaluating the use of public surveillance cameras for crime control and prevention. Washington: The Urban Institute
Levesley T & Martin A 2005. Police attitudes to and use of CCTV. Home Office online report. London: Home Office.
Lum C 2011. The influence of places on police decision pathways: From call for service to arrest. Justice Quarterly 28(4): 631–665
Morgan A & Coughlan M 2018. Police use of CCTV on the rail network. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 561. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi561
Morgan A & Louis E 2009. Key issues in graffiti. Research in practice no. 6. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rip/rip6
Morgan A & McAtamney A 2009. Key issues in alcohol-related violence. Research in practice no. 4. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rip/rip4
NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR) 2017. NSW Criminal Court Statistics 2016. Sydney: BOCSAR. https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Pages/bocsar_court_stats/bocsar_court_stats.aspx
Olphin T 2015. Solving violent crime: Targeting factors that predict clearance of non-domestic violent offences (Master’s thesis). University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Paine C 2012. Solvability factors in dwelling burglaries in Thames Valley (Master’s thesis). University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Piza EL 2018. The history, policy implications and knowledge gaps of the CCTV literature: Insights for the development of body-worn video camera research. International Criminal Justice Review: DOI: 10.1177/1057567718759583
Piza EL, Caplan JM & Kennedy LW 2014. Is the punishment more certain? An analysis of CCTV detections and enforcement. Justice Quarterly 31(6): 1015–1043. DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2012.723034
Ratcliffe J 2006. Video surveillance of public places. Problem-orientated guides for police response guides series no 4. Washington: US Department of Justice
Reynald DM 2017. Informal guardians and offender decision making, in Bernasco W, van Gelder JL & Elffers H (eds), The Oxford handbook of offender decision making. New York: Oxford University Press: 361–373
Robb P, Coupe T & Ariel B 2015. 'Solvability' and detection of metal theft on railway property. European Journal of Criminal Policy Research 21: 463-484. DOI: 10.1007/s10610-014-9253-7
Rosenbaum P & Rubin D 1985. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician 39(1): 33–38
Sharp S 2016. Pickpocketing on the railway: Targeting solvable cases (Master’s thesis). University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Wells HA, Allard T & Wilson P 2006. Crime and CCTV in Australia: Understanding the relationship. Gold Coast: Centre for Applied Psychology and Criminology, Bond University
Welsh BC & Farrington DP 2009. Public area CCTV and crime prevention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly 26(4): 716–745. DOI: 10.1080/07418820802506206