Child exploitation material (CEM) is sexually abusive images of children that are typically disseminated via the internet. This paper reviews recent literature to establish a profile of those who view or collect CEM. CEM offenders are predominantly male, white, with an average age of between 35 and 45 and they are often single. They also tend to be better educated and are more likely to work in professional occupations than other sexual offenders. CEM offenders tend to be less assertive, less dominant and less socially confident than other sexual offenders and show higher levels of sexual deviancy. They are also more likely to sexually fantasise about children. They tend to have few previous convictions and are at low risk of reconviction.This study will help law enforcement and corrections practitioners to target resources towards this offending group.
References
URLs correct as at May 2024
Note: An asterisk denotes that the reference was not part of the literature search but is included as additional background material.
Armstrong J & Mellor D 2016. Internet child pornography offenders: An examination of attachment and intimacy deficits. Legal and Criminological Psychology 21: 41–55
Aslan D & Edelmann R 2014. Demographic and offence characteristics: a comparison of sex offenders convicted of possessing indecent images of children, committing contact sex offences or both offences. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 25(2): 121–134
Aslan D, Edelmann R, Bray D & Worrell M 2014. Entering the world of sex offenders: An exploration of offending behaviour patterns of those with both internet and contact sex offences against children. Journal of Forensic Practice 16(2): 110–126
*Australian Communications Media Authority (ACMA) & Office of the Children’s eSafety Commissioner 2017. Annual reports 2016–17. Canberra: ACMA & Office of the Children’s eSafety Commissioner
*Australian Communications Media Authority (ACMA) & Office of the Children’s eSafety Commissioner 2016. Annual reports 2015–16. Canberra: ACMA & Office of the Children’s eSafety Commissioner
*Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) 2017. Organised crime in Australia 2017. Canberra: ACIC. https://www.acic.gov.au/publications/unclassified-intelligence-reports/organised-crime-australia-2017
*Australian Federal Police (AFP) 2017. Annual report 2016–17. Canberra: AFP
Babchishin KM, Hanson K & Hermann CA 2011. The characteristics of online sex offenders: A metaanalysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 23(1): 92–123
Babchishin KM, Hanson K & VanZuylen H 2015. Online child pornography offenders are different: A meta-analysis of the characteristics of online and offline sex offenders against children. Archives of Sexual Behavior 44(1): 45–66
Bailey JM, Hsu KJ & Bernhard PA 2016. An internet study of men sexually attracted to children: Correlates of sexual offending against children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 125(7): 989–1000
Bates A & Metcalf C 2007. A psychometric comparison of internet and non-internet sex offenders from a community treatment sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression 13(1): 11–20
*Brumby KM 1996. Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 8(1): 37–54
Burgess AW, Carretta CM & Burgess AG 2012. Patterns of federal internet offenders: A pilot study. Journal of Forensic Nursing 8(3): 112–121
Clevenger SL, Navarro JN & Jasinski JL 2016. A matter of low self-control? Exploring differences between child pornography possessors and child pornography producers/distributors using self-control theory. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 28(6): 555–571
*Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) 2017. Annual report 2016–17. Canberra: CDPP
DeLisi M, Caropreso DE, Drury AJ, Elbert MJ, Evans JL, Heinrichs T & Tahja KM 2016. The dark figure of sexual offending: New evidence from federal sex offenders. Journal of Criminal Psychology 6(1): 3–15
Eke AW, Seto MC & Williams MC 2011. Examining the criminal history and future offending of child pornography offenders: An extended prospective follow-up study. Law and Human Behavior 35(6): 466–478
Elliott IA & Ashfield S 2011. The use of online technology in the modus operandi of female sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression 17(1): 92–104
Elliott IA, Beech AR & Mandeville-Norden R 2013. The psychological profiles of internet, contact, and mixed internet/contact sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 25(1): 3–20
Elliott IA, Beech AR, Mandeville-Norden R & Hayes E 2009. Psychological profiles of internet sexual offenders: Comparisons with contact sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 21(1): 76–92
Endrass J, Urbaniok F, Hammermeister LC, Benz C, Elbert T, Laubacher A & Rossegger A 2009. The consumption of internet child pornography and violent and sex offending. BMC Psychiatry 9: 43
Faust E, Bickart W, Renaud C & Camp S 2015. Child pornography possessors and child contact sex offenders: A multilevel comparison of demographic characteristics and rates of recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 27(5): 460–478
*Helmus L, Hanson RK, Babchishin KM & Mann RE 2013. Attitudes supportive of sexual offending predict recidivism: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence & Abuse 14(1): 34–53
Henry O, Mandeville-Norden R, Hayes E & Egan V 2010. Do internet-based sexual offenders reduce to normal, inadequate and deviant groups? Journal of Sexual Aggression 16(1): 33–46
Henshaw M, Ogloff JRP & Clough JA 2017. Looking beyond the screen: A critical review of the literature on the online child pornography offender. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 29(5): 416–445
Houtepen JABM, Sijtsema JJ & Bogaerts S 2014. From child pornography offending to child sexual abuse: A review of child pornography offender characteristics and risk for cross-over. Aggression and Violent Behavior 19(5): 466–473
Howitt D & Sheldon K 2007. The role of cognitive distortions in paedophilic offending: Internet and contact offenders compared. Psychology, Crime and Law 13(5): 469–486
Jung S, Ennis L, Stein S, Choy AL & Hook T 2013. Child pornography possessors: Comparison and contrasts with contact- and non-contact sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression 19(3): 295–310
Kettleborough DF & Merdian HL 2017. Gateway to offending behaviour: Permission-giving thoughts of online users of child exploitation material. Journal of Sexual Aggression 23(1): 19–32
Krone T & Smith RG 2017. Trajectories in online child sexual exploitation offending in Australia. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 524. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi524
Kuhle LF, Schlinzig E, Kaiser G, Amelung T, Konrad A, Röhle R & Beier KM 2016. The association of sexual preference and dynamic risk factors with undetected child pornography offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression 23(1): 3–18
Long ML, Alison LA & McManus MA 2013. Child pornography and likelihood of contact abuse: A comparison between contact child sexual offenders and noncontact offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 25(4): 370–395
Magaletta PR, Faust E, Bickart W & McLearen A 2014. Exploring clinical and personality characteristics of adult male internet-only child pornography offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 58(2): 137–153
McCarthy JA 2010. Internet sexual activity: A comparison between contact and non-contact child pornography offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression 16(2): 181–195
McManus MA, Long ML & Alison L 2015. Factors associated with contact child sexual abuse in a sample of indecent image offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 21(3): 368–384
Merdian HL, Curtis C, Thakker J, Wilson N & Boer DP 2014. The endorsement of cognitive distortions: Comparing child pornography offenders and contact sex offenders. Psychology, Crime and Law 20(10): 971–993
Merdian HL, Curtis C, Thakker J, Wilson N & Boer DP 2013. The three dimensions of online child pornography offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression 19(1): 121–132
*Mitchell KJ, Jones LM, Finkelhor D & Wolak J 2011. Internet-facilitated commercial sexual exploitation of children: Findings from a nationally representative sample of law enforcement agencies in the United States. Sexual Abuse 23(1): 43–71
Navarro JN & Jasinski JL 2015. Demographic and motivation differences among online sex offenders by type of offense: An exploration of routine activities theories. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 24(7): 753–771
Neutze J, Grundmann D, Scherner G & Beier KM 2012. Undetected and detected child sexual abuse and child pornography offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 35(3): 168–175
Neutze J, Seto MC, Schaefer GA, Mundt IA & Beier KM 2011. Predictors of child pornography offenses and child sexual abuse in a community sample of pedophiles and hebephiles. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 23(2): 212–242
Nielssen O, O’Dea J, Sullivan D, Rodriguez M, Bourget D & Large M 2011. Child pornography offenders detected by surveillance of the internet and other methods. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 21(3): 215–224
Prat S & Jonas C 2012. Characteristics of French users of child pornography: Description of a cohort subjected to forensic evaluation. Medico-Legal Journal 80(4): 162–166
Price M, Lambie I & Krynen AM 2015. New Zealand adult internet child pornography offenders. Journal of Criminal Psychology 5(4): 262–278
Ray JV, Kimonis ER & Seto MC 2014. Correlates and moderators of child pornography consumption in a community sample. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 26(6): 523–545
Seigfried KC, Lovely RW & Rogers MK 2008. Self-reported online child pornography behavior: A psychological analysis. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 2(1): 286–297
Seigfried-Spellar KC & Rogers MK 2010. Low neuroticism and high hedonistic traits for female internet child-pornography consumers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 13(6): 729–635
Seto MC & Eke AW 2015. Predicting recidivism among adult male child pornography offenders: Development of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT). Law and Human Behavior 39(4): 416–429
Seto MC & Eke AW 2005. The criminal histories and later offending of child pornography offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 17(2): 201–210
Seto MC, Hanson KR & Babchishin KM 2011. Contact sexual offending by men with online sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 23(1): 124–145
Seto MC, Wood JM, Babchishin KM & Flynn S 2012. Online solicitation offenders are different from child pornography offenders and lower risk contact sexual offenders. Law and Human Behavior 36(4): 320–330
Shelton J, Eakin J, Hoffer T, Muirhead Y & Owens J 2016. Online child sexual exploitation: An investigative analysis of offender characteristics and offending behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior 30: 15–23
Surjadi B, Bullens R, van Horn J & Bogaerts S 2010. Internet offending: Sexual and non-sexual functions within a Dutch sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression 16(1): 47–58
Tomak S, Weschler FS, Ghahramanlou-Holloway M, Virden T & Nademin ME 2009. An empirical study of the personality characteristics of internet sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression 15(20): 139–148
Tsagaris GS, Bach JE & Cimino C 2017. The characteristics of federal offenders sentenced for sexual exploitation of children within a large urban metropolitan region. Journal of Sexual Aggression 23(2): 181–194
*Ward T & Keenan T 1999. Child molesters’ implicit theories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 14(8): 821–838
Webb L, Craissati J & Keen S 2007. Characteristics of internet child pornography offenders: A comparison with child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 19(4): 449–465
Wolak J, Finkelhor D & Mitchell KJ 2011. Child-pornography possessors: Trends in offender and case characteristics. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 23(1): 22–42
Wolak J, Finkelhor D & Mitchell KJ 2005. Child pornography possessors arrested in internet-related crimes: Findings from the National Juvenile Online Victimization Study. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
*Wolak J, Finkelhor D, Mitchell KJ & Jones LM 2011. Arrests for child pornography production: Data at two time points from a national sample of US law enforcement agencies. Child Maltreatment 16(3): 184–195
Wurtele SK, Simons DA & Moreno T 2014. Sexual interest in children among an online sample of men and women: Prevalence and correlates. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 26(6): 546–568