Finding ways to reduce repeat domestic violence requires an understanding of both violent relationships and what happens during violent incidents. The current study uses crime script analysis to describe incidents of men’s violence against women. The results provide new insights into the situational factors present when arguments escalate to violence. These findings highlight the important role of third parties (eg friends and other family members) and the potential for bystander intervention. They also show the significance of emotion and intoxication. The ability of police to de-escalate violence is highlighted. Most importantly, the findings illustrate how crime script analysis can be applied to domestic violence to help identify ways to intervene to prevent repeat violence and reduce harm to victims.
References
Anderson KL & Umberson D 2001. Gendering violence: Masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender and Society 15(3): 358–380
Babcock J et al. 2016. Domestic violence perpetrator programs: A proposal for evidence-based standards in the United States. Partner Abuse 7(4): 355–459
Beauregard E, Proulx J, Rossmo K, Leclerc B & Allaire JF 2007. Script analysis of the hunting process of serial sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior 34(8): 1069–1084
Boles SM & Miotto K 2003. Substance abuse and violence: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior 8(2): 155–174
Bowen E, Heron J, Waylen A, Wolke D & ALSPAC Study Team 2005. Domestic violence risk during and after pregnancy: Findings from a British longitudinal study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 112(8): 1083–1089
Boxall H, Payne J & Rosevear L 2015. Prior offending among family violence perpetrators: A Tasmanian sample. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 493. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi493
Boxall H, Rosevear L & Payne J 2015. Identifying first-time family violence perpetrators: The usefulness and utility of categorisations based on police offence records. Trends & issues in crime & criminal justice no. 487. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi487
Breckenridge J, Chung D, Spinney A & Zufferey C 2016. National mapping and meta-evaluation outlining key features of effective “safe at home” programs that enhance safety and prevent homelessness for women and their children who have experienced domestic and family violence: Final report. Horizons Research Report no. 1. Sydney: Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety
Breckenridge J, Walden I & Flax G 2014. Staying Home Leaving Violence evaluation report. Sydney: Gendered Violence Research Network, University of New South Wales
Carter JG & Grommon E 2016. Police as alert responders? Lessons learned about perceived roles and responses from pretrial GPS supervision of domestic violence defendants. Policing 10(4): 361–377
Chiu YN, Leclerc B & Townsley M 2011. Crime script analysis of drug manufacturing in clandestine laboratories: Implications for prevention. British Journal of Criminology 51(2): 355–374
Clarke RV & Cornish DB 1985. Modelling offenders’ decisions: a framework for research and policy, in Tonry M & Morris N (ed) Crime and Justice: A review of research vol 6, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Clarke RV & Newman GR 2006. Outsmarting the terrorists. Westport CT: Praeger Security International
COAG 2011. National Plan to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children 2010–2022. Canberra: Australian Government
Cook A & Reynald D 2016. Guardianship against sexual offences, exploring the role of gender in intervention. International Criminal Justice Review 26(2): 98-114
Cornish DB 1994a. The procedural analysis of offending and its relevance for situational prevention, in Clarke RV (ed), Crime prevention studies vol 3. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press: 151–196
Cornish DB 1994b. Crimes as Scripts, in Zahm D & Cromwell P (eds), Proceedings of the International Seminar on Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Statistical Analysis Center, Florida Criminal Justice Executive Institute & Florida Department of Law Enforcement: 30–45
Cornish DB & Clarke RV 2003. Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention, in Smith M & Cornish DB (eds), Theory for practice in situational crime prevention: Crime prevention studies vol 16. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press: 41–96
Dobash RE & Dobash RP 1984. The nature and antecedents of violent events. British Journal of Criminology 24(3) 269–288
Dowling C, Morgan A, Hulme S, Manning M & Wong G 2018. Protection orders for domestic violence: A systematic review. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 551. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi551
Erez E, Ibarra P, Bales W & Gur O 2012. GPS monitoring technologies and domestic violence: An evaluation study. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/238910.pdf
Exum ML 2006. Alcohol and aggression: An integration of findings from experimental studies. Journal of Criminal Justice 34: 131–145
Exum ML 2002. The application and robustness of the rational choice perspective in the study of intoxicated and angry intentions to aggress. Criminology 40(4): 933–966
Exum ML, Austin LA & Franklin JD 2017. The effect of alcohol and arousal on criminal decision making, in Bernasco W, van Gelder JL & Elffers H (eds), The Oxford handbook of offender decision making. New York: Oxford University Press: 445–465
Farrell G 2010. Situational crime prevention and its discontents: rational choice and harm reduction versus ‘cultural criminology’. Social Policy and Administration 44(1): 40–66
Felson R 2013. What are violent offenders thinking? In Leclerc B & Wortley R (eds), Cognition and crime: Offender decision making and script analyses. UK: Routledge: 12–25
Felson M 2008. Routine activity approach, in Wortley R & Mazerolle L (eds), Environmental criminology and crime analysis. UK: Willan
Felson RB & Massoglia M 2012. When is violence planned? Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27: 753–74
Gage AJ & Hutchinson PL 2006. Power, control, and intimate partner sexual violence in Haiti. Archives of Sexual Behavior 35(1): 11–24
Hamberger LK 1997. Female offenders in domestic violence: A look at actions in their context. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 1(1): 117–129
Hancock G & Laycock G 2010. Organised crime and crime scripts: Prospects for disruption, in Bullock K, Clarke RV & Tilley N (eds), Situational prevention of organised crimes. Cullompton: Willan: 172–192
Hayes B 2016. Repeat victimization among intimate partner violence victims: The impact of guardianship. Feminist Criminology 13(2): 138–159
Hayward K 2007. Situational crime prevention and its discontents: Rational choice theory versus the ‘culture of now’. Social Policy and Administration 41(3): 232–250
Heise L 1998. Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women 4: 262–290
Hester M & Westmarland N 2005. Tackling domestic violence: Effective interventions and approaches. Home Office Research Study 290. London: Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office
Holtzworth-Munroe A & Stuart G 1994. Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin 116: 476–497
Hutchings A & Holt TJ 2014. A crime script analysis of the online stolen data market. British Journal of Criminology 55(3): 596–614
Jacobs BA & Wright R 2010. Bounded rationality, retaliation, and the spread of urban violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 25(10): 1739–1766
Johnson MP 2010. A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston: University Press of New England
Johnston J & Campbell L 1993. A clinical typology of interparental violence in disputed-custody divorces. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 63(2): 190–199
Krishnan S, Rocca C, Hubbard A, Subbiah K, Edmeades J & Padian N 2010. Do changes in spousal employment status lead to domestic violence? Insights from a prospective study in Bangalore, India. Social Science and Medicine 70(1): 136–143
Lacoste J & Tremblay P 2003. Crime and innovation: A script analysis of patterns in check forgery, in Smith M & Cornish DB (eds), Theory for practice in situational crime prevention: Crime prevention studies vol 16. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press: 169–196
Landis JR & Koch GG 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1): 159–174
Leclerc B & Wortley R 2013. The reasoning criminal: twenty-five years on, in Leclerc B & Wortley R (eds), Cognition and crime: Offender decision making and script analyses. UK: Routledge: 1–11
Leclerc B, Wortley R & Smallbone S 2011. Getting into the script of adult child sex offenders and mapping out situational prevention measures. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 48(2): 209–237
Lloyd S, Farrell G & Pease K 1994. Preventing repeated domestic violence: A demonstration project on Merseyside. Crime Prevention Unit Series, paper no. 49. London: Home Office Police Research Group
Mackay E, Gibson A, Lam H & Beecham D 2015. Perpetrator interventions in Australia: Part one – Literature review. Landscapes: State of Knowledge no. 1. Sydney: Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety
McMahon S & Dick A 2011. “Being in a room with like-minded men”: An exploratory study of men’s participation in a bystander intervention program to prevent intimate partner violence. The Journal of Men’s Studies 19(1): 3–18
Morgan A, Boxall H & Brown R 2018. Targeting repeat domestic violence: Assessing short-term risk of reoffending. Trends & issues in crime & criminal justice no. 552. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi552
Morselli C & Roy J 2008. Brokerage qualifications in ringing operations. Criminology 46(1): 71–98
Natarajan M 2016. Police response to domestic violence: A case study of TecSOS mobile phone use in the London Metropolitan Police Service. Policing 10(4): 378–390
Parkinson D & Zara C 2013. The hidden disaster: Domestic violence in the aftermath of natural disaster. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 28(2): 28–35
Peterson K et al. 2016. An evaluation of two dating violence prevention programs on a college campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. DOI: 10.1177/0886260516636069
Prenzler T & Fardell L 2017. Situational prevention of domestic violence: A review of security-based programs. Aggression and Violent Behaviour 34: 51–68
Salmivalli C 2010. Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior 15: 112–120
Shorey RC et al. 2012. Arrest history and intimate partner violence perpetration in a sample of men and women arrested for domestic violence. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 1: 132–140
Smith MJ 2017. Expanding the script analytic approach using victim narratives: Learning about robberies of taxi drivers from the drivers themselves, in Leclerc B & Savona EU (eds), Crime prevention in the 21st century. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing: 77–98
Smith MJ & Cornish DB 2006. Secure and tranquil travel: Preventing crime and disorder on public transport. United Kingdom: Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science, University College London
Stark E 2009. Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press
State of Victoria 2016. Royal Commission into Family Violence: Summary and recommendations. Parliamentary Paper no. 132 (2014–16). Melbourne: Victorian Government. https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20170219002819/http://www.rcfv.com.au/Report-Recommendations
Stuart GL, Moore TM, Gordon KC, Hellmuth JC, Ramsey SE & Kahler CW 2006. Reasons for intimate partner violence perpetration among arrested women. Violence Against Women 12(7): 609–621
Taylor E & MacKay R 2011. BSAFE Pilot Project 2007–2010: Interim evaluation report. Wangaratta: Women’s Health Goulburn North East
Tedeschi JT & Felson RB 1994. Violence, aggression and coercive actions. Washington: American Psychological Association
Tremblay P, Talon B & Hurley D 2001. Body switching and related adaptations in the resale of stolen vehicles: Script elaborations and aggregate crime learning curves. British Journal of Criminology 41(4): 561–579
Trimboli L 2017. Outcome evaluation of NSW’s Safer Pathway Program: Victims’ experiences. Crime and Justice Bulletin: Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice no. 202. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Pages/bocsar_publication/Pub_Summary/CJB/cjb202-Outcome-evaluation-of-NSW-Safer-Pathway-Program-Victims-Experiences.aspx
Ullman SE 2007. A 10-year update of “Review and critique of empirical studies of rape avoidance”. Criminal Justice and Behavior 34(3): 411–429
van Gelder JL 2017. Emotions in offender decision making, in Bernasco W, van Gelder JL & Elffers H (eds), The Oxford handbook of offender decision making. New York: Oxford University Press: 466–478
VicHealth 2007. Preventing violence before it occurs: A framework and background paper to guide the primary prevention of violence against women in Victoria. Carlton South: VicHealth
Vigurs C, Wire J, Myhill A & Gough D 2016. Police initial responses to domestic abuse: A systematic review. London: College of Policing.
Walker L 1979. The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row Publishers
Walters GD 2015. The decision to commit crime: Rational or nonrational? Criminology, Criminal Justice Law, and Society 16(3): 1–18
Wortley R 1997. Reconsidering the role of opportunity in situational crime prevention, in Newman G, Clarke RV & Shoham SG (eds), Rational choice and situational crime prevention: Theoretical foundations. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing: 65–81