Protection orders are a common legal response to domestic violence which aim to prevent further re-victimisation by the perpetrator. The current study systematically reviews research into the use and impact of protection orders, using the EMMIE framework (Effectiveness, Mechanisms, Moderators, Implementation and Economy).Meta-analysis is used to examine the overall effect of protection orders, while narrative synthesis is used to examine the underlying mechanisms and moderators of their effectiveness, their implementation and economic viability. Protection orders are associated with a small but significant reduction in domestic violence. They appear to be more effective under certain circumstances, including when the victim has fewer ties to the perpetrator and a greater capacity for independence, and less effective for offenders with a history of crime, violence and mental health issues.
References
* Included in systematic review of protection orders
Australian Bureau of Statistics 2017. Recorded crime – offenders, 2015-16. ABS cat. no. 4519.0. Canberra: ABS. https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4519.0Main+Features12015-16?OpenDocument=
*Bell ME & Goodman LA 2001. Supporting battered women involved with the court system. Violence Against Women 7(12): 1377–1404
*Benitez CT, McNiel DE & Binder RL 2010. Do protection orders protect? The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 38(3): 376–385
Berk RA, Campbell A, Klap R & Western B 1992. The deterrent effect of arrest in incidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. American Sociological Review 57(5): 698–708
Booth A, Sutton A & Papaioannou D 2016. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: Sage
Boxall H, Boyd C, Dowling C & Morgan A forthcoming. Understanding domestic violence incidents using crime script analysis. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 558. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi558
*Bulbeck C, Kwitko L, Stewart A & Dower J 1997. Characteristics of parties involved in domestic violence protection orders: An analysis of court and police data. Criminology Research Council Report 29/94-5. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/crg/reports/crg-2994-5
*Burgess-Proctor A 2003. Evaluating the efficacy of protection orders for victims of domestic violence. Women and Criminal Justice 15(1): 33–54
*Carlson MJ, Harris SD & Holden GW 1999. Protective orders and domestic violence: Risk factors for re-abuse. Journal of Family Violence 14(2): 205–226
*Carter JG & Grommon E 2016. Police as alert responders? Lessons learned about perceived roles and responses from pretrial GPS supervision of domestic violence defendants. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paw009
Cornish DB & Clarke RV 2003. Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention, in Smith MJ & Cornish DB (eds), Theory for practice in situational crime prevention. New York: Criminal Justice Press: 41–96
*Crime and Misconduct Commission (CMC) 2005. Policing domestic violence in Queensland: Meeting the challenges. Brisbane: Crime and Misconduct Commission
Department of Social Services 2010. National plan to reduce violence against women and their children 2010–2022. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Social Services
Domestic Violence Legislation Working Group 1999. Model domestic violence laws. Canberra: Commonwealth Attorney-General’s Department
*Douglas H & Fitzgerald R 2013. Legal processes and gendered violence: Cross-applications for domestic violence protection orders. UNSW Law Journal 36(1): 56–87
*Douglas H & Stark T 2010. Stories from survivors: Domestic violence and criminal justice interventions. Brisbane: University of Queensland
Dowling C, Morgan A, Boyd C & Voce I forthcoming. Policing domestic violence: A review of the evidence. Research report no. 13. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rr/rr13
Farrington DP, Gottfredson DC, Sherman LW & Welsh BC 2002. The Maryland Scientific Methods Scale, in Sherman LW, Farrington DP, Welsh BC & MacKenzie DL (eds), Evidence-based crime prevention. New York: Routledge: 13–21
*Fischer K & Rose M 1995. When “enough is enough”: Battered women’s decision making around court orders of protection. Crime & Delinquency 41(4): 414–429
*Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary 2015. Increasingly everyone’s business: A progress report on the police response to domestic abuse. London: UK. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary
*Hester M & Westmarland N 2005. Tackling domestic violence: Effective interventions and approaches. London: Home Office
*Holmes WM 1993. Police arrests for domestic violence. American Journal of Police 12(4): 101–125
*Holt VL, Kernic MA, Lumley T, Wolf ME & Rivara FP 2002. Civil protection orders and risk of subsequent policereported violence. Journal of the American Medical Association 288(5): 589–594
*Holt VL, Kernic MA, Wolf ME & Rivara FP 2003. Do protection orders affect the likelihood of future partner violence and injury? American Journal of Preventative Medicine 24(1): 16–21
*Home Office 2013. Evaluation of the pilot of domestic violence protection orders. Research report 76. London: Home Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/evaluation-of-the-pilot-of-domestic-violence-protection-orders
*Horton AL, Simonidis KM & Simonidis LL 1987. Legal remedies for spousal abuse: Victim characteristics, expectations, and satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence 2(3): 265–279
*Isaac NE, Cochran D, Brown ME & Adams SL 1994. Men who batter: Profile from a restraining order database. Archive of Family Medicine 3: 50–54
Jeffries S, Bond CEW & Field R 2013. Australian domestic violence protection order legislation: A comparative quantitative content analysis of victim safety provisions. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 25(2): 627–643
Johnson SD, Tilley N & Bowers KJ 2015. Introducing EMMIE: An evidence rating scale to encourage mixedmethod crime prevention synthesis reviews. Journal of Experimental Criminology 11: 459–473
*Jordan CE, Pritchard AJ, Duckett D & Charnigo R 2010. Criminal offending among respondents to protective orders: Crime types and patterns that predict victim risk. Violence Against Women 16(12): 1,396–1,411
*Kaci JH 1992. A study of protective orders issued under California’s domestic violence prevention act. Criminal Justice Review 17(1): 61–76
*Kane RJ 2000. Police responses to restraining orders in domestic violence incidents: Identifying the custody-threshold thesis. Criminal Justice and Behavior 27(5): 561–580
*Kanuha VK & Ross ML 2004. The use of temporary restraining orders (TROs) as a strategy to address intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims 19(3): 343–356
*Keilitz SL, Hannaford PL & Efkeman HS 1996. Civil protection orders: The benefits and limitations for victims of domestic violence. Williamsburg VA: National Center for State Courts
Kelly L, Sharp N & Klein R 2014. Finding the costs of freedom: How women and children rebuild their lives after domestic violence. London: Solace Women’s Aid
*Kernsmith P & Craun SW 2008. Predictors of weapon use in domestic violence incidents reported to law enforcement. Journal of Family Violence 23: 589–596
*Kinports K & Fischer K 1993. Orders of protection in domestic violence cases: An empirical assessment of the impact of the reform statutes. Texas Journal of Women and the Law 2: 163–276
*Kothari CL et al. 2012. Protection orders protect against assault and injury: A longitudinal study of policeinvolved women victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27(14): 2,845–2,868
*Lewis R, Dobash RP, Dobash, RE & Cavanagh K 2000. Protection, prevention, rehabilitation or justice? Women’s use of the law to challenge domestic violence. International Review of Victimology 7(1): 179–205
*Lloyd S, Farrell G & Pease K 1994. Preventing repeated domestic violence: A demonstration project on Merseyside. Crime Prevention Unit Series 49. London: Home Office
*Logan TK, Shannon L & Cole J 2007. Stalking victimization in the context of intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims 22(6): 669–683
*Logan TK, Shannon L & Walker R 2005. Protective orders in rural and urban areas: A multiple perspective study. Violence Against Women 11(7): 876–911
*Logan TK & Walker R 2010. Civil protective order effectiveness: Justice or just a piece of paper? Violence and Victims 25(3): 332–348
*Logan TK & Walker R 2009. Civil protective order outcomes: Violations and perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 24(4): 675–692
*Logan TK, Walker R & Hoyt W 2012. The economic costs of partner violence and the cost-benefit of civil protective orders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27(6): 1,137–1,154
*McFarlane J, Malecha A, Gist J, Watson K, Batten E, Hall I & Smith S 2004. Protection orders and intimate partner violence: An 18-month study of 150 black, hispanic, and white women. American Journal of Public Health 94(9): 679–695
*Mears DP, Carlson MJ, Holden GW & Harris SD 2001. Reducing domestic violence revictimization: The effects of individual and contextual factors and type of legal intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 16(12): 1,260–1,283
*Meloy JR, Cowett PY, Parker SB, Hofland B & Friedland A 1997. Domestic protection orders and the prediction of subsequent criminality and violence toward protectees. Psychotherapy 34(4): 447–458
*Migliore C, Ziersch E & Marshall J 2014. Intervention orders and the intervention response model: Evaluation report 3 (statistical overview and outcome evaluation). Office of Crime Statistics and Research. Adelaide: South Australian Attorney-General’s Department
*Moore E 2002. Not just court: Family violence in rural New South Wales: Aboriginal women speak out. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Rural Social Research
Morgan A, Boxall H & Brown R 2018. Targeting repeat domestic violence: Assessing short-term risk of reoffending. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 552. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi552
*Natarajan M 2016. Police response to domestic violence: A case study of TecSOS mobile phone use in the London Metropolitan Police Service. Policing 10(4): 378–390
*New South Wales Ombudsman 2006. Domestic violence: Improving police practice. Sydney: NSW Ombudsman
Pawson R 2002. Evidence-based policy: The promise of ‘realist synthesis’. Evaluation 8(3): 340–358
Pawson R & Tilley N 1997. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage
*Phillips SW & Gillham J 2010. Policing domestic violence: The significance of charging in the post-arrest decision making of police officers. Partner Abuse 1(2): 200–219
*Phillips SW & Sobol JJ 2010. Twenty years of mandatory arrest: Police decision making in the face of legal requirements. Criminal Justice Policy Review 21(1): 98–118
*Phillips SW & Varano SP 2008. Police criminal charging decisions: An examination of post-arrest decisionmaking. Journal of Criminal Justice 36: 307-315
*Poerio L 1991. An evaluation of police training in handling domestic violence situations (Master’s thesis). University of Adelaide, Australia
*Poynton S, Stavrou E, Marott N & Fitzgerald J 2016. Breach rate of apprehended domestic violence orders in NSW. Bureau Brief no. 119. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research
Queensland Police Service 2017. Operational procedures manual: Public edition. 58.2. Brisbane: Queensland Police Service
*Ragusa AT 2012. Rural Australian women’s legal help seeking for intimate partner violence: Women intimate partner violence victim survivors’ perceptions of criminal justice support services. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 28(4): 685–717
*Rigakos GS 2002. Peace bonds and violence against women: A three-site study of the effect of Bill C-42 on process, application and enforcement. Ottawa: Justice Canada
*Rigakos GS 1997. Situational determinants of police responses to civil and criminal injunctions for battered women. Violence Against Women 3(2): 204–216
Rosenthal JA 1996. Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. Journal of Social Service Research 21(4): 37–59
*Segrave M, Wilson D & Fitz-Gibbon K 2016. Policing intimate partner violence in Victoria (Australia): Examining police attitudes and the potential of specialisation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology advance online publication
*Sentencing Advisory Council 2015. Sentencing for contravention of family violence intervention orders and safety notices: Second monitoring report. Melbourne: State of Victoria, Sentencing Advisory Council
*Sentencing Advisory Council 2013. Family violence intervention orders and safety notices: Sentencing for contravention monitoring report. Melbourne: Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council
*State of Victoria 2016. Royal Commission into Family Violence: Report and recommendations, vol III. Melbourne: State of Victoria. https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20190305222508/http://www.rcfv.com.au/MediaLibraries/RCFamilyViolence/Reports/Final/RCFV-Vol-III.pdf
*Stewart A 2000. Who are the respondents of domestic violence protection orders? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 33(1): 77–90
*Tam DMY, Tutty LM, Zhuang ZH & Paz E 2016. Racial minority women and criminal justice responses to domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence 31: 527–538
*Taylor A, Ibrahim N, Wakefield S & Finn K 2015. Domestic and family violence protection orders in Australia: An investigation of information sharing and enforcement: State of knowledge paper. Landscapes 16. Alexandria: Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety
*Taylor E & Mackay R 2011. BSAFE pilot project 2007-2010. Goulburn: Women’s Health Goulburn North East
*Trimboli L & Bonney R 1997. An evaluation of the NSW apprehended violence order scheme. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research
*Victorian Auditor-General’s Office 2009. Implementing Victoria Police’s code of practice for the investigation of family violence. Melbourne: Victorian Auditor-General’s Office
Victoria Police 2014. Code of practice for the investigation of family violence 3(2). Melbourne: Victoria Police
*Wan AM 2000. Battered women in the restraining order process. Violence Against Women 6(6): 606–632
*Wareham M 1993. Police response to family violence in Victoria. Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Violence. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20140212105630/http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/conferences/ncv2/wareham.pdf
*Weisz AN, Tolman RM & Bennett L 1998. An ecological study of nonresidential services for battered women within a comprehensive community protocol for domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence 13(4): 395–415
Wilcox K 2010. Recent innovations in Australian protection order law: A comparative discussion. Topic Paper 19. Sydney: Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse, University of New South Wales
*Wolf ME, Holt VL, Kernic MA & Rivara FP 2000. Who gets protection orders for intimate partner violence? American Journal of Preventative Medicine 19(4): 286–291
*Young M, Byles J & Dobson A 2000. The effectiveness of legal protection in the prevention of domestic violence in the lives of young Australian women. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 148. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi148