Sexual offending has a significant impact on victims and can cause considerable angst within the community. The effective management of sex offenders in the community is of paramount importance. This paper reviews the latest empirical evidence from Australia and overseas regarding the effectiveness of public and non-public sex offender registries. Results show that while public sex offender registries may have a small general deterrent effect on first time offenders, they do not reduce recidivism. Further, despite having strong public support, they appear to have little effect on levels of fear in the community. While the evidence is limited to a small number of US studies, non-public sex offender registries do appear to reduce reoffending by assisting law enforcement. The review concludes by highlighting important considerations to help inform future decisions about the feasibility of a public register in Australia.
References
ABC News 2014. Public offenders register: Derryn Hinch meets Queensland Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie. ABC News, 29 Jul. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-29/public-sex-offenders-register-hinch-meets-qld-attorney-general/5631358
Agan AY & Prescott JJ 2014. Sex offender law and the geography of victimization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 11(4): 786–828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12056
Anderson AL & Sample LL 2008. Public awareness and action resulting from sex offender community notification laws. Criminal Justice Policy Review 19(4): 371–396
Australian Bureau of Statistics 2017. Crime Victimisation, Australia, 2015–2016. ABS cat. no. 4530.0. Canberra: ABS. https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4530.0Main+Features12015-16?OpenDocument=
Australian Bureau of Statistics 2016. Recorded Crime – Victims, Australia, 2015. ABS cat. no. 4510.0. Canberra: ABS. https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4510.0Main+Features12015?OpenDocument=
Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission 2016. National Child Offender System. https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20161017053649/https://www.acic.gov.au/our-services/child-protection/national-child-offender-system
Australian Institute of Criminology 2014. Identifying the outcomes of national information services and systems for police partner agencies and the wider community: A whole-of-service logic model for CrimTrac. Report prepared for CrimTrac
Australian Institute of Family Studies 2013. Offender registration legislation in each Australian state and territory. https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20140411201917/http://www.aifs.org.au/institute/pubs/carc/3b.html
Australian Law Reform Commission 2010. Family Violence: A National Legal Response. Sydney: Australian Law Reform Commission. https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/family-violence-a-national-legal-response-alrc-report-114/
Beard J & Lipscombe S 2016. Registration and management of sex offenders. House of Commons Library briefing paper no. SN05267. http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN05267#fullreport
Beck VS, Clingermayer J, Ramsey RJ & Travis LF 2004. Community response to sex offenders. Journal of Psychiatry and Law 32: 141–170
Beck VS & Travis LF 2004. Sex offender notification and fear of victimization. Journal of Criminal Justice 32: 455–463
Bell F 2017. Public sex offenders register under ‘serious consideration’ by Victorian Opposition. ABC News, 4 Apr. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-04-04/public-sex-offenders-register-consideration-matthewguy/8415256
Boyle DJ, Ragusa-Salerno LM, Marcus AF, Passannante MR & Furrer S 2014. Public knowledge and use of sexual offender internet registries: Results from a random digit dialing telephone survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 29(10): 1,914–1,932
Brady N 2011. ‘Sexting’ youths placed on sex offenders register. The Age, 24 Jul. http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/sexting-youths-placed-on-sex-offenders-register-20110723-1hugu.html
Brannon YN, Levenson JS, Fortney T & Baker JN 2007. Attitudes about community notification: A comparison of sexual offenders and the non-offending public. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 9(4): 369–379
Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR) 2015. Progress of sexual offences through the NSW criminal justice system: 2006–2015. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
Cashmore J & Shackel R 2013. The long-term effects of child sexual abuse. Child Family Community Australia paper no. 11. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies. https://aifs.gov.au/resources/policy-and-practice-papers/long-term-effects-child-sexual-abuse
Crofts T & Lee M 2013. ‘Sexting’, children and child pornography. Sydney Law Review 35: 85–106
Center for Sex Offender Management (CSOM) 2001. Community Notification and Education. Silver Spring: Center for Sex Offender Management.
Daniel Morcombe Foundation 2016. Public sex offender website. https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20160229135825/http://www.danielmorcombe.com.au/blog/public-sex-offender-website
Day A, Carson E, Boni N & Hobbs G 2014. The management of sex offenders in the community: From policy to practice. Australian Journal of Social Issues 49(3): 249–394
Day A, Carson E, Newton D, & Hobbs G 2014. Professional views on the management of sex offenders in the community. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 53(3): 171–189
Drake EK 2011. ‘What works’ in community supervision: Interim report. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy
Drake EK & Aos S 2009. Does sex offender registration and notification reduce crime? A systematic review of the research literature. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy
Elferink J 2015. Decision to delay Daniel’s Law. Media release (Attorney-General and Minister for Justice) 27 Nov. https://newsroom.nt.gov.au/article?id=17023
Elferink J 2014. Public sex offender website to protect Territory families. Media release (Attorney-General and Minister for Justice) 15 Oct. https://newsroom.nt.gov.au/article?id=10059
Fitzgerald J 2006. The attrition of sexual offences from the New South Wales criminal justice system. Criminal Justice Bulletin no. 92. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Pages/bocsar_publication/Pub_Summary/CJB/cjb92-Attrition-of-sexual-offences-from-the-NSW-criminal-justice-system.aspx
Gibbons S & Machin S 2008. Valuing school quality, better transport, and lower crime: Evidence from house prices. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24(1): 99–119
Hanson RK, Gordon A, Harris AJR, Marques JK, Murphy W, Quinsey VL & Seto MC 2002. First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 14(2): 169–194
Hanson RK & Morton-Bourgon KE 2005. The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Studies 73(6): 1,154–1,163
Harripersad KW 2014. From sexting to sex offender: Adult punishment for teenage hijinks. Florida A&M University Law Review
Harris AJ & Cudmore R 2016. Community experience with public sex offender registries in the United States: A national survey. Criminal Justice Policy Review (online first)
Harris AJ & Socia KM 2016. What’s in a name? Evaluating the effects of the “sex offender” label on public opinions and beliefs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 28(7): 660–678
Hinch D 2013. Does Australia need a national public register of convicted sex offenders?https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20170301142102/http://www.humanheadline.com.au/viewer-poll?CollectionRepeater1=4
Koon-Magnin S 2015. Perceptions of and support for sex offender policies: Testing Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, and Baker’s findings. Journal of Criminal Justice 43: 80–88
Långström N, Enebrink P, Laurén E, Lindblom J, Werkö S & Hanson RK 2013. Preventing sexual abusers of children from reoffending: Systematic review of medical and psychological interventions. British Medical Journal 347. http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f4630
Lasher MP & McGrath RJ 2012. The impact of community notification on sex offender reintegration: A quantitative review of the research literature. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 56(1): 6–28
Lee M, Crofts T, McGovern A & Milivojevic S 2015. Sexting among young people: Perceptions and practices. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 508. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi508
Letourneau EJ, Bandyopadhyay D, Sinha D & Armstrong KS 2009. The influence of sex offender registration on juvenile sexual recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review 20(2): 136–153
Letourneau EJ, Levenson JS, Bandyopadhyay D, Armstrong KS & Sinha D 2010. Effects of South Carolina’s sex offender registration and notification policy on deterrence of adult sex crimes. Criminal Justice and Behavior 37(5): 537–552
Levenson JS, Brannon YN, Fortney T & Baker J 2007. Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 7(1): 137–167
Levenson JS & Cotter LP 2005. The effect of Megan’s Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 21(1): 49–66
Levenson JS & D’Amora DA 2007. Social policies designed to prevent sexual violence: The emperor’s new clothes? Criminal Justice Policy Review 18(2): 168–199
Levenson J, Letourneau E, Armstrong K & Zgoba KM 2010. Failure to register as a sex offender: Is it associated with recidivism? Justice Quarterly 27(3): 305–331
Lieb R & Nunlist C 2008. Community notification as viewed by Washington’s citizens: A 10-year follow-up. Document no. 08-03-1101. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/Reports/240
Lievore D 2004. Recidivism of sexual offenders: Rates, risk factors and treatment efficacy. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/cfi/cfi72
Linden L & Rockoff JE 2008. Estimates of the impact of crime risk on property values from Megan’s Laws. American Economic Review 98(3): 1,103–1,127
Logan WA 2011. Prospects for the international migration of U.S. sex offender registration and community notification laws. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 34: 233–238
Lösel F & Schmucker M 2005. The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology 1(1): 117–146
Mancini C 2014. Examining factors that predict public concern about the collateral consequences of sex crime policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review 25(4): 450–475
Nathan L, Wilson NJ & Hillman D 2003. Te whakakotahitanga: An evaluation of the te piriti special treatment programme for child sex offenders in New Zealand. Christchurch: New Zealand Department of Corrections
Padgett KG, Bales WD & Blomberg TG 2006. Under surveillance: An empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring. Criminology and Public Policy 5(1): 61–91
Pawson R 2006. Evidence based policy: A realist perspective. London: Sage
Pawson R 2002. Does Megan’s Law work? A theory-driven systematic review. London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice
Pope JC 2008. Fear of crime and housing prices: Household reactions to sex offender registries. Journal of Urban Economics 64: 601–614
Powell M, Day A, Benson M, Vess J & Graffam J 2014a. Australian police officers’ perceptions of sex offender registries. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy 24(1): 120–133
Powell M, Day A, Benson M, Vess J & Graffam J 2014b. Police officers’ perceptions of interviewing offenders on sex offender registries. International Journal of Police Science & Management 16(4): 255–266
Preiss B 2017. Sweeping changes to sex offenders register. The Age, 11 May. http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/sweeping-changes-to-sex-offenders-register-20170510-gw1zad.html
Prescott JJ & Rockoff JE 2011. Do sex offender registration and notification laws affect criminal behavior? Journal of Law and Economics 54(1): 161–206
Ragusa-Salerno LM & Zgoba KM 2012. Taking stock of 20 years of sex offender laws and research: An examination of whether sex offender legislation has helped or hindered our efforts. Journal of Crime and Justice 35(3): 335–355
Richards K 2011. Misperceptions about child sex offenders. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 429. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi429
Richards R & Calvert C 2009. When sex and cell phones collide: Inside the prosecution of a teen sexting case. Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 1: 35–36
Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse 2016. Consultation paper: Criminal justice. Sydney: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20160615054919/http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/policy-and-research/our-policy-work/criminal-justice
Sandler J, Freeman NJ, Socia KM 2008. Does a watched pot boil? A time-series analysis of New York State’s sex offender registration and notification law. Psychology, Public Policy and Law 14(4): 284–302
Schiavone SK & Jeglic EL 2009. Public perceptions of sex offender social policies and the impact on sex offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 53(6): 679–695
Schram D & Milloy CD 1995. Community notification: A study of offender characteristics and recidivism. Olympia, WA: Washington Institute for Public Policy
Skinner J 2016. Daniel’s Law closer to reality after Derryn Hinch elected to Senate, Bruce Morcombe says. ABC News, 7 Jul. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-07/daniels-law-derryn-hinch-public-sex-offendersregister/7575778
Snyder HN 2000. Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident, and offender characteristics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/sexual-assault-young-children-reported-law-enforcement-victim-incident-and
Taylor SC 2017. Community perceptions of a public sex offender registry introduced in Western Australia. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal 18(3): 275–290
Tewksbury R, Jennings WG & Zgoba KM 2012. A longitudinal examination of sex offender recidivism prior to and following the implementation of SORN. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 30: 308–328
Thakker J 2014. Cultural factors in offender treatment: Current approaches in New Zealand. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 113: 213–223
Vess J, Day A, Powell M & Graffam J 2014. International sex offender registration laws: Research and evaluation issues based on a review of current scientific literature. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal 14(4): 322–335
Vess J, Langskaill B, Day A, Powell M & Graffam J 2011. A comparative analysis of Australian sex offender legislation for sex offender registries. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 44(3): 404
Victorian Law Reform Commission 2014. Sex offenders registration: Final report. Melbourne: Victorian Law Reform Commission. https://www.lawreform.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/SOR_Final-Report_Full-text_0.pdf
Wan WY, Poynton S, van Doorn G & Weatherburn D 2014. Parole supervision and reoffending. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice 485. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi485
Washington State Institute for Public Policy (WSIPP) 2016. Benefit-cost results: Adult criminal justice. Olympia, WA: WSIPP. http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/BenefitCost
Wentland S, Waller B & Brastow R 2014. Estimating the effect of crime risk on property values and time on market: Evidence from Megan’s Law in Virginia. Real Estate Economics 42(1): 223–251
Whitting L, Day A & Powell M 2016. Police officer perspectives on the implementation of a sex offender community notification scheme. International Journal of Police Science & Management 18(4): 261–272
Whitting L, Day A & Powell M 2014. The impact of community notification on the management of sex offenders in the community: An Australian perspective. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 47(2): 240–258
Woodrow A & Bright DA 2011. Effectiveness of a sex offender treatment programme: A risk band analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 55(1): 43–55
Yeh S 2015. Revealing the rapist next door: Property impacts of a sex offender registry. International Review of Law and Economics 44: 42–60
Zevitz RG 2006. Sex offender community notification: Its role in recidivism and offender reintegration. Criminal Justice Studies 19: 193–208
Zevitz RG & Farkas MA 2000. Sex offender community notification: Assessing the impact in Wisconsin. Research in Brief no. NCJ 179992. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/179992.pdf
Zgoba K, Veysey B, & Dalessandro M 2010. An analysis of the effectiveness of community notification and registration: Do the best intentions predict the best practices? Justice Quarterly 27: 667–691
Zgoba K, Witt P, Dalessandro M & Veysey B 2008. Megan’s law: Assessing the practical and monetary efficacy. Trenton: New Jersey Department of Corrections. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/225370.pdf