The challenges associated with investigating serious crime, particularly organised crime, are well known. Increasingly, police are turning to new information technologies to support traditional investigative techniques. Automated ballistic information technology allows police to link cases that would otherwise not be known to be related. By linking investigations, police can identify new leads and suspects. The current study used interviews with investigators in two states to understand what impact ballistic evidence has on criminal investigations into firearm crime. The results revealed a significant number of cases benefited from linked investigations—including cold cases and cases involving organised crime groups. This research helps to demonstrate the potential value of technology to law enforcement, and the circumstances in which it is most effective.
References
URLs correct as at August 2024
Alderden MA & Lavery TA 2007. Predicting homicide clearances in Chicago: Investigating disparities in predictors across different types of homicide. Homicide Studies 11(2): 115–132
Australian Crime Commission (ACC) 2015. The costs of serious and organised crime in Australia 2013–14. Canberra: ACC. https://www.acic.gov.au/publications/unclassified-intelligence-reports/costs-serious-and-organised-crime-australia
Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) 2016. Illicit firearms in Australia factsheet. Canberra: ACIC. https://www.acic.gov.au/publications/unclassified-intelligence-reports/illicit-firearms-australia-report
Baskin D & Sommers I 2010. The influence of forensic evidence on the case outcomes of homicide incidents. Journal of Criminal Justice 38(6): 1,141–1,149
Braga AA 2008. Gun enforcement and ballistic imaging technology in Boston, in Cork DL, Rolph JE, Meieran ES and Petrie CV (eds), Ballistic imaging. Washington DC: National Academies Press: 291–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/12162
Braga AA and Pierce GL 2004. Linking crime guns: The impact of ballistics imaging technology on the productivity of the Boston Police Department’s ballistics unit. Journal of Forensic Sciences 49(4): 701–706
Bricknell S 2012. Firearm trafficking and serious and organised crime gangs. Research and public policy series no. 116. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/rpp116
Bryant W & Cussen T 2015. Homicide in Australia: 2010–11 to 2011–12. Monitoring report no. 23. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://aic.gov.au/publications/mr/mr23
Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research 2015. Non-fatal shootings statistics in NSW. https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20160314013156/http://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Pages/bocsar_pages/Non-fatal-shootings-statistics-in-NSW.aspx
Cork DL, Rolph JE, Meieran ES & Petrie CV 2008. Ballistic imaging. Washington DC: National Academies Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/12162
Dauvergne M & Li G 2006. Homicide in Canada, 2005. Juristat 26(6): 1–26. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/85-002-X20060069507
Fitzgerald J 2013. Non-fatal shootings in NSW. Crime and Justice Statistics Bureau Brief 85: 1–7. https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Publications/BB/bb85.pdf
Higginson A, Eggins E & Mazerolle L 2017. Police techniques for investigating serious violent crime: A systematic review. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 539. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi539
INTERPOL 2016. INTERPOL Ballistic Information Network (IBIN). https://www.interpol.int/Crimes/Firearms-trafficking/INTERPOL-Ballistic-Information-Network
King W, Wells W, Katz C, Maguire E & Frank J 2013. Opening the black box of NIBIN: A descriptive process and outcome evaluation of the use of NIBIN and its effects on criminal investigations, Final report. Washington DC: US Department of Justice and National Institute of Justice
Koper C, Lum C & Willis J 2014. Optimizing the use of technology in policing: Results and implications from a multi-site study of the social, organisational and behavioural aspects of implementing police technologies. Policing 8(2): 212–221
Lemieux F, Bricknell S & Prenzler TY 2015. Mass shootings in Australia and the United States, 1981–2013. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice 1(3): 131–142
Lum C, Koper C & Willis J 2016. Understanding the limits of technology’s impact on police effectiveness. Police Quarterly 20(2): 135–163
Mouzos J 2003. Homicide in the course of other crime in Australia. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 252: 1-6. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi252
Mouzos J & Muller D 2001. Solvability factors of homicide in Australia: An exploratory analysis. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 216. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi216
Regoeczi WC, Jarvis J & Riedel M 2008. Clearing murders: Is it about time? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 45(2): 142–162
Shroeder DA & White MD 2009. Exploring the use of DNA evidence in homicide investigations: Implications for detective work and case clearance. Police Quarterly 12(3): 319–342
Wilson DB, Weisburd D & McClure D 2011. Use of DNA testing in police investigative work for increasing offender identification, arrest, conviction and case clearance. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2011(7). https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/better-evidence/dna-testing-police-for-identification-arrest-conviction-case-clearance.html
Worrall JL 2016. Investigative resources and crime clearances: A group-based trajectory approach. Criminal Justice Policy Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403416650251
Yang Y, Koffman A, Hocherman G & Wein LM 2014. Using spatial, temporal and evidence-status data to improve ballistic imaging performance. Journal of Forensic Science 59(1): 103–111