This study examined recidivism in an Australian correctional population. Three different groups of offenders were identified from their recidivism profiles: low-risk or slow recidivists, moderate-risk or delayed recidivists, and high-risk or rapid recidivists. Slow recidivists were more likely to be younger Indigenous men, with a history of both drug use and parole suspension or cancellation. Delayed recidivists were more likely to be younger non-Indigenous women serving shorter sentences. Rapid recidivists were differentiated only by being more likely to serve shorter sentences.
References
URLS correct at September 2024
Asparouhov T, Masyn K & Muthén B 2006. Continuous time survival in latent variable models. Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meeting in Seattle http://www.statmodel.com/download/SurvivalJSM3.pdf
Borzycki M & Baldry E 2003. Promoting integration: the provision of prisoner post release services. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice no. 262. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi262
Bushway SD, Brame R & Paternoster R 2004. Connecting desistance and recidivism: Measuring changes in criminality over the lifespan. In Maruna S & Immarigeon R (eds), After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration. Devon, UK: Willan: 85–101
Holland S, Pointon K & Ross S 2007. Who Returns to Prison?: Patterns of Recidivism Among Prisoners Released from Custody in Victoria in 2002–03. Corrections Research Paper Series no. 1. Victoria: Department of Justice, Corrections Victoria. https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20190318220500/http://assets.justice.vic.gov.au/corrections/resources/50606073-3dee-4ded-b214-d8160ce3bc83/who_returns_to_prison.pdf
Kurlychek MC, Bushway SD & Brame R 2012. Long-term crime desistance and recidivism patterns: Evidence from the Essex county convicted felon study. Criminology 50(1): 71–103
Laub JH & Sampson RJ 2001. Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and justice 28: 1–69
Maltz MD 1984. Recidivism. New York, NY: Academic Press
Maruna S 2001. Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Morris RG, Barnes JC, Worrall JL & Orrick EA 2013. Analyzing the presence and consequences of unobserved heterogeneity in recidivism research. Crime & Delinquency. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713495952
Nylund KL, Asparouhov T & Muthén BO 2007. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural equation modeling 14(4): 535–569
Payne J 2007. Recidivism in Australia: findings and future research. Research and Public Policy series no. 80. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/rpp80
Reisig MD, Holtfreter K & Morash M 2006. Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly 23(3): 384–405
Singer JD & Willett JB 2003. Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press
Wan WY, Poynton S, van Doorn G & Weatherburn D 2014. Parole supervision and reoffending. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice no. 485. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti174972
Data were drawn from the Queensland Corrective Services Integrated Offender Management System.
The findings will be useful to policymakers and practitioners working in corrections and related fields.