Research evaluating restorative justice programs for domestic and family violence and sexual violence is limited in Australia and internationally. In 2019 the AIC was commissioned to evaluate the Australian Capital Territory’s Restorative Justice Scheme for domestic and family violence and sexual violence (‘Phase Three’).
The evaluation examined the process and outcomes of Phase Three, including barriers to delivery, activities delivered and outcomes associated with participation. A range of data was examined, including interviews with participants (n=16) and stakeholders (n=47), analysis of post-conference surveys (n=28) and analysis of administrative and reoffending data.
The evaluation demonstrated Phase Three is working effectively overall. Participants and stakeholders report high levels of satisfaction with Phase Three and the service they received. There was evidence that victim-survivors could meet a range of justice needs with varying levels of offender participation and accountability. Some areas for improving referrals were identified.
References
URLs correct as at August 2024
ACT Government 2022a. Justice and Community Services Directorate annual report 2021–22. https://www.justice.act.gov.au/annual-report-2021-22
ACT Government 2022b. Seven-day lockdown for the ACT. Media release, 12 August. https://www.covid19.act.gov.au/news-articles/seven-day-lockdown-for-the-act
ACT Government 2021a. Canberra’s recovery plan: Easing of restrictions roadmap (as at 14 April 2021). Canberra: ACT Government. https://www.act.gov.au/open/act-recovery-plan
ACT Government 2021b. Listen. Take action to prevent, believe and heal. Canberra: Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Steering Committee, ACT Government. https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-3010585130/view
ACT Government 2020a. Canberra’s recovery plan: COVID-19 easing of restrictions roadmap. Canberra: ACT Government
ACT Government 2020b. Canberra’s recovery plan: COVID-19 easing of restrictions roadmap as at 06 August 2020. Canberra: ACT Government
Aertsen I, Bolívar D & Lauwers N 2011. Restorative justice and the active victim: Exploring the concept of empowerment. Temida 14(1): 5–19. https://doi.org/10.2298/TEM1101005A
Australian Attorney-General’s Department 2022. The meeting of Attorneys-General work plan to strengthen criminal justice responses to sexual assault. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia (Attorney-General’s Department). https://www.ag.gov.au/crime/publications/work-plan-strengthen-criminal-justice-responses-sexual-assault-2022-27
Australian Bureau of Statistics 2021. Sexual violence—victimisation.https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/sexual-violence-victimisation
Australian Bureau of Statistics 2016. Table 19.3: Police involvement after partner violence, by sex of respondent and partner type, proportion of persons [dataset]. Personal Safety Survey, Australia, 2016. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/personal-safety-australia/2016#data-downloads
Australian Bureau of Statistics 2011. Australian and New Zealand Standard Offence Classification (ANZSOC), 2011, 3rd ed. Canberra: ABS. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/1234.0
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2022. Family, domestic and sexual violence data in Australia. Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence/family-domestic-sexual-violence-data
Balser S, Withrow A, Johnson LR & Duke Chaikin C 2024. Restorative Justice in cases of intimate partner violence in the United States: A metasynthesis. Families in Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894231212546
Barocas B, Avieli H & Mills LG 2023. Restorative Justice treatment for domestic violence crimes: A qualitative study. Criminal Justice and Behavior 00938548231202815. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231202815
Barocas B, Avieli H & Shimizu R 2020. Restorative Justice approaches to intimate partner violence: A review of interventions. Partner Abuse 11(3): 318–349. https://doi.org/10.1891/PA-2020-0010
Barr A & Stephen-Smith R 2020. The ACT Minister for Health Rachel Stephen-Smith has declared a public health emergency in response to the rapidly evolving COVID-19 situation across Australia. Media release, 16 March. https://www.cmtedd.act.gov.au/open_government/inform/act_government_media_releases/barr/2020/public-health-emergency-declared-for-act
Batchelor D 2021. Challenging cases: A guide for helping victims achieve their restorative justice goals with different degrees of offender participation. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19866.70081
Blagg, H, Bluett-Boyd N & Williams E 2015. Innovative models in addressing violence against Indigenous women: State of knowledge paper. Landscapes, 08/2015. Sydney: ANROWS. https://www.anrows.org.au/publication/innovative-models-in-addressing-violence-against-indigenous-women-state-of-knowledge-paper/
Bolitho J 2015. Putting justice needs first: A case study of best practice in restorative justice. Restorative Justice 3(2): 256–281. http://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2015.1069531
Bolitho J & Freeman K 2016. The use and effectiveness of Restorative Justice in criminal justice systems following child sexual abuse or comparable harms. Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Sydney. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2877603
Boxall H, Morgan A & Terer K 2012. Evaluation of the Family Group Conferencing pilot program. Research and public policy series no. 121. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/rpp121
Boxall H & Sabol B 2021. Adolescent family violence: Findings from a group-based analysis. Journal of Family Violence 36: 787–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00247-8
Braithwaite J 1999. Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice 25. https://doi.org/10.1086/449287
Braithwaite J & Strang H (eds) 2002. Restorative justice and family violence. Port Melbourne, Vic: Cambridge University Press. https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/catalog/1790221
Bredewold F & Tonkens E 2021. Understanding successes and failures of family group conferencing: An in-depth multiple case study. British Journal of Social Work 51(6): 2173–2190. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab062
Bright S, Roach C, Barnaba L, Walker S & Millsteed M 2021. Attrition of sexual offence incidents through the Victorian criminal justice system: 2021 update. Crime Statistics Agency, Victorian Government. https://www.crimestatistics.vic.gov.au/research-and-evaluation/publications/attrition-of-sexual-offence-incidents-through-the-victorian
Broadhurst R, Morgan A, Payne J & Maller R 2018. Restorative justice: An observational outcome evaluation of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) program. Report for the ACT Justice and Community Safety Directorate. Canberra: Australian National University and the Australian Institute of Criminology. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3413715
Burns CJ & Sinko L 2023. Restorative Justice for survivors of sexual violence experienced in adulthood: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 24(2): 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211029408
Campbell R, Adams AE, Wasco SM, Ahrens CE & Sefl T 2010. ‘What has it been like for you to talk with me today?’: The impact of participating in interview research on rape survivors. Violence Against Women 16(1): 60–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209353576
Claes B & Shapland J 2016. Desistance from crime and restorative justice. Restorative Justice 4(3): 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2016.1245912
Clark H 2010. “What is the justice system willing to offer?”: Understanding sexual assault victim/survivors’ criminal justice needs. Family Matters 85: 28–37. https://aifs.gov.au/research/family-matters/no-85/what-justice-system-willing-offer
Coker D 1999. Enhancing autonomy for battered women: Lessons from Navajo peacemaking. UCLA Law Review 47: 1. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2638905
Curtis-Fawley S & Daly K 2005. Gendered violence and restorative justice: The views of victim advocates. Violence Against Women 11(5): 603–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205274488
Daly K 2017. Sexual violence and victims’ justice interests. In E Zinsstag & M Keenan (eds), Restorative responses to sexual violence: Legal, social and therapeutic dimensions. London: Routledge
Daly K 2014. Reconceptualizing sexual victimization and justice. In I Van Fraechem, A Pemberton and F Ndahinda (eds), Justice for victims: Perspectives on rights, transition and reconciliation vol. 1. New York: Routledge
Daly K 2011. Conventional and innovative responses to sexual violence. Canberra: Australian Institute for the Study of Sexual Assault. https://apo.org.au/node/26507
Daly K, Bouhours B, Broadhurst R & Loh N 2013. Youth sex offending, recidivism and restorative justice: Comparing court and conference cases. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 46(2): 241–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865812470383
Daly K & Nancarrow H 2010. Restorative justice and youth violence towards parents. In J Ptacek (ed), Restorative Justice and violence against women. New York: Oxford University Press
Daly K & Stubbs J 2006. Feminist engagement with restorative justice. Theoretical Criminology 10(1): 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480606059980
Daly K & Wade D 2017. Sibling sexual violence and victims’ justice interests: A comparison of youth conferencing and judicial sentencing. In E Zinsstag & M Keenan (eds), Restorative responses to sexual violence: Legal, social and therapeutic dimensions. London: Routledge: 143–178
Dowling C & Morgan A 2019. Predicting repeat domestic violence: Improving police risk assessment. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 581. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti04053
Fitz-Gibbon K, Meyer S, Boxall H, Maher J & Roberts S 2022. Adolescent family violence in Australia: A national study of service and support needs for young people who use family violence. Research report no. 15/2022 Sydney: ANROWS. https://www.anrows.org.au/publication/adolescent-family-violence-in-australia-a-national-study-of-prevalence-history-of-childhood-victimisation-and-impacts/
Foley T 2013. Are retributive aims achievable in a restorative justice setting? Journal of Judicial Administration 22: 130–137
Gang D, Loff B, Naylor B & Kirkman M 2021. A call for evaluation of Restorative Justice programs. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 22(1): 186–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019833003
Gavrielides T 2015. Is restorative justice appropriate for domestic violence cases? Social Work Review 14(4): 105–121. https://research.ebsco.com/c/3qqoms/viewer/pdf/jr5so3sxxr
Hadar N & Gal T 2023. Survivors’ paths toward forgiveness in Restorative Justice following sexual violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior 50(6): 911–928. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854823116210
Hainmueller J 2012. Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis 20(1): 25–46. https://doi.org10.1093/pan/mpr025
Harvey RA, Hayden JD, Kamble PS, Bouchard JR & Huang JC 2017. A comparison of entropy balance and probability weighting methods to generalize observational cohorts to a population: A simulation and empirical example. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 26(4): 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4121
Hayes H 2005. Assessing reoffending in restorative justice conferences. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 38(1): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.38.1.77
Hudson B 2002. Restorative Justice and gendered violence: Diversion or effective justice? The British Journal of Criminology 42(3): 616–634. www.jstor.org/stable/23638884
Hulme S, Morgan A & Boxall H 2019. Domestic violence offenders, prior offending and reoffending in Australia. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 580. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti04077
Jeffries S, Wood WR & Russell T 2021. Adult restorative justice and gendered violence: Practitioner and service provider viewpoints from Queensland, Australia. Laws 10(1): 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10010013
Joudo-Larsen J 2014. Restorative justice in the Australian criminal justice system. Research and public policy series no. 127. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/rpp127
Jülich S & Landon F 2017. Achieving justice outcomes: Participants of Project Restore’s restorative processes. In E Zinsstag & M Keenan (eds), Restorative responses to sexual violence: Legal, social and therapeutic dimensions. New York: Routledge
Jülich S & Landon F 2013. Achieving outcomes for participants of Project Restore’s restorative processes: The perspectives of participants. New Zealand: Project Restore
Koss MP 2014. The RESTORE program of restorative justice for sex crimes: Vision, process, and outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 29(9): 1623–1660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513511537
Lauwaert K & Aertsen I 2016. With a little help from a friend: Desistance through victim–offender mediation in Belgium. Restorative Justice 4(3): 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2016.1245913
Lawler S & Boxall H 2023. Reporting of dating app facilitated sexual violence to the police: Victim-survivor experiences and outcomes. Trends & issues in crime & criminal justice no. 662. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78887
Loff B, Naylor B & Bishop L 2019. A community-based survivor-victim focussed restorative justice: A pilot. Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/crg/reports/crg-3314-15
Marsh B & Maruna S 2016. Desistance and restorative justice: Learning from success stories of Northern Ireland’s Youth Justice Agency. Restorative Justice 4(3): 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2016.1243855
Marshall T 1999. Restorative justice: An overview. London: Home Office
Maruna S 2016. Desistance and restorative justice: It’s now or never. Restorative Justice 4(3): 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2016.1243853
McMullin J & Schonberger B 2022. When good balance goes bad: A discussion of common pitfalls when using entropy balancing. Journal of Financial Reporting 7(1): 167–196. https://doi.org/10.2308/JFR-2021-007
Miller SL, Hefner MK & Iovanni L 2020. Practitioners’ perspectives on using restorative justice with crimes of gendered violence. Contemporary Justice Review 23(1): 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2019.1700372
Miller SL & Iovanni L 2013. Using restorative justice for gendered violence: Success with a postconviction model. Feminist Criminology 8(4): 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085113490781
Mills LG, Barocas B & Ariel B 2013. The next generation of court-mandated domestic violence treatment: A comparison study of batterer intervention and restorative justice programs. Journal of Experimental Criminology 9(1): 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9164-x
Mills LG, Barocas B, Butters RP & Ariel B 2019. A randomized controlled trial of restorative justice-informed treatment for domestic violence crimes. Nature Human Behaviour 3(12): 1284–1294. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0724-1
Moore D & Vernon A 2023. Setting relations right: Core skills and new horizons for restorative practices. Abingdon: Routledge
Morgan A, Boxall H, Terer K & Harris DN 2012. Evaluation of alternative dispute resolution initiatives in the care and protection jurisdiction of the NSW Children’s Court. Research and public policy series no. 118. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/rpp118
Moulds L, Day A, Mayshak R, Mildred H & Miller P 2019. Adolescent violence towards parents—Prevalence and characteristics using Australian Police Data. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 52(2): 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865818781206
Muller CJ & MacLehose RF 2014. Estimating predicted probabilities from logistic regression: Different methods correspond to different target populations. International Journal of Epidemiology 43(3): 962–970. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu029
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council and Universities Australia (2023). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2023
Parish WJ, Keyes V, Beadles C & Kandilov A 2017. Using entropy balancing to strengthen an observational cohort study design: Lessons learned from an evaluation of a complex multi-state federal demonstration. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 18(1): 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-017-0174-z
Pennell J & Burford G 2000. Family group decision making: Protecting children and women. Child Welfare 79(2): 131–158. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45400209
Pennell J & Burford G 1994. Widening the circle: Family group decision making. Journal of Child and Youth Care 9(1): 1–11
Pennell J, Burford G, Sasson E, Packer H & Smith EL 2021. Family and community approaches to intimate partner violence: Restorative programs in the United States. Violence Against Women 27(10): 1608–1629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220945030
Piggott E & Wood W 2018. Does restorative justice reduce recidivism? Assessing evidence and claims about restorative justice and reoffending. In T Gavrielides (ed), Routledge international handbook of restorative justice. London: Routledge: Chapter 24
Prentky R & Righthand S 2003. Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II) Manual. https://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/202316/index.html
Presser L & Gaarder E 2000. Can restorative justice reduce battering? Some preliminary considerations. Social Justice 27(1): 175–195
Prochaska JO & CC DiClemente 1982. Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice 19(3): 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088437
Ptacek J 2014. Evaluation research on restorative justice and intimate partner violence: A review and critique. How can intimate partner violence be prevented? A workshop on developing effective primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions. Presented at the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Justice, Arlington, VA
Ptacek J 2010. Re-imagining justice for crimes of violence against women. In J Ptacek (ed), Restorative justice and violence against women. New York: Oxford University Press: 282–286
Robinson G & Shapland J 2008. Reducing recidivism: A task for restorative justice? British Journal of Criminology 48(3): 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azn002
Rosenbaum A & Langhinrichsen-Rohling J 2006. Meta-research on violence and victims: The impact of data collection methods on findings and participants. Violence and Victims 21(4): 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.21.4.404
Rosenbaum PR & Rubin DB 1985. The bias due to incomplete matching. Biometrics 41(1): 103–116. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4005368/
Rossner M 2013. Just emotions: Rituals of restorative justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Sen R, Morris K, Burford G, Featherstone B & Webb C 2018. ‘When you’re sitting in the room with two people one of whom… has bashed the hell out of the other’: Possibilities and challenges in the use of FGCs and restorative approaches following domestic violence. Children and Youth Services Review 88: 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.027
Shapland J, Robinson G & Sorsby A 2011. Restorative justice in practice: Evaluating what works for victims and offenders. London: Willan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203806104
Sharpless L, Kershaw T & Willie TC 2022. Associations between state-level restorative justice policies and mental health among women survivors of intimate partner violence. SSM – Mental Health 2: 100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100085
Sherman L & Strang H 2007. Restorative justice: The evidence. London: Smith Institute
Sherman LW, Strang H, Barnes G, Wood D, Bennett S, Inkpen N, Newbury-Birch D, Rossner M, Angel C, Mearns M & M Slothower. 2015. Twelve experiments in restorative justice: The Jerry Lee program of randomized trials of restorative justice conferences. Journal of Experimental Criminology 11(4): 501–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9247-6
Smith N & Weatherburn D 2012. Youth justice conferences versus Children’s Court: A comparison of re-offending. Crime and Justice Bulletin no. 160. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. https://bocsar.nsw.gov.au/research-evaluations/2012/cjb160-youth-justice-conferences-versus-childrens-court-a-comparison-of-re-offending.html
Special Taskforce on Domestic and Family Violence in Queensland 2015. Not now, not ever, Volume 1: Report and recommendations. Brisbane: Queensland Government. https://www.publications.qld.gov.au/dataset/not-now-not-ever/resource/533db62b-b2c9-43cc-a5ff-f9e1bc95c7c7
State of Victoria 2016. Royal Commission into Family Violence: Summary and recommendations. Melbourne: Victorian Government. http://rcfv.archive.royalcommission.vic.gov.au/Report-Recommendations.html
Strang H, Sherman LW, Mayo-Wilson E, Woods D & Ariel B 2013. Restorative justice conferencing (RJC) using face-to-face meetings of offenders and victims: Effects on offender recidivism and victim satisfaction: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews 9(1): 1–59. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2013.12
Stubbs J 2007. Beyond apology? Domestic violence and critical questions for restorative justice. Criminology & Criminal Justice 7(2): 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895807075570
Stubbs J 2004. Restorative justice, domestic violence and family violence. Sydney: Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse, UNSW
Suzuki M & Yuan X 2021. How does restorative justice work? A qualitative metasynthesis. Criminal Justice and Behavior 48(10): 1347–1365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854821994622
Thomas DR 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation 27(2): 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Tripepi G, Chesnaye NC, Dekker FW, Zoccali C & Jager KJ 2020. Intention to treat and per protocol analysis in clinical trials. Nephrology 25(7): 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.13709
Umbreit MS, Coates RB & Vos B 2004. Restorative justice versus community justice: Clarifying a muddle or generating confusion? Contemporary Justice Review 7(1): 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/1028258042000212030
Ward T & Langlands RL 2008. Restorative justice and the human rights of offenders: Convergences and divergences. Aggression and Violent Behavior 13(5): 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AVB.2008.06.001
Wilson DB, Olaghere A & Kimbrell CS 2018. Effectiveness of restorative justice principles in juvenile justice: A meta-analysis. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/effectiveness-restorative-justice-principles-juvenile-justice-meta-analysis
Wolthuis A & Lünnemann K 2016. Restorative Justice and domestic violence: A guide for practitioners. Verwey-Jonker Institute. https://www.verwey-jonker.nl/publicatie/restorative-justice-and-domestic-violence-a-guide-for-practitioners/
Women’s Safety and Justice Taskforce 2022. Hear her voice: Report 2 Volume 1L Women and girls’ experiences across the criminal justice system. Brisbane: Women’s Safety and Justice Taskforce. https://www.womenstaskforce.qld.gov.au/publications
Zehr H 1990. Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice. Scottsdale PA: Herald Press
Zhao Q & Percival D 2017. Entropy balancing is doubly robust. Journal of Causal Inference 5(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2016-0010
Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Acronyms
- Abstract
- Executive summary
- Introduction
- Methods
- The design and implementation of Phase Three
- Referrals to Phase Three
- Pre-conference processes
- Conferences
- Post-conference processes
- The impact of Phase Three
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- References
- Appendix A: Evaluation framework
- Appendix B: Interview schedule for person harmed
- Appendix C: Interview schedule for person responsible
- Appendix D: Interview schedule for stakeholders