Targeting fixated individuals to prevent intimate partner homicide: Proposing the Domestic Violence Threat Assessment Centre

Exclamation mark on computer screen
Abstract

Intimate partner homicide (IPH) is one of the most common forms of homicide in Australia. Despite rates falling over time, it remains the most common homicide threat for Australian women, who are the victims of three-quarters of all IPH incidents.

Recent research has viewed some IPH perpetrators as being motivated by fixation and grievances. These fixated perpetrators hold an intense preoccupation with an individual, which may be driven by a grievance, during the acute phases of risk. In this paper we propose a trial of the Domestic Violence Threat Assessment Centre (DVTAC). Modelled on the Fixated Threat Assessment Centres, the DVTAC could offer a multi-agency approach to information gathering, monitoring and intervention among high-risk domestic violence offenders during periods of acute risk.

References

URLs correct as at May 2024

Adams SJ, Hazelwood TE, Pitre NL, Bedard TE & Landry SD 2009. Harassment of members of parliament and the legislative assemblies in Canada by individuals believed to be mentally disordered. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 20(6): 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940903174063

Australian Domestic and Family Violence Death Review Network & Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety 2022. Australian Domestic and Family Violence Death Review Network Data Report: Intimate partner violence homicides 2010–2018. Research report 03/2022. Sydney: Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ANROWS). https://www.anrows.org.au/project/australian-domestic-and-family-violence-death-review-network-national-data-update/

Boxall H, Doherty L, Lawler S, Franks C & Bricknell S 2022. The “pathways to intimate partner homicide” project: Key stages and events in male-perpetrated intimate partner homicide in Australia. Special reports. Sydney: ANROWS. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/special/special-15

Boxall H & Morgan A 2021. Experiences of coercive control among Australian women. Statistical Bulletin no. 30. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/sb78108

Clemmow C, Gill P, Bouhana N, Silver J & Horgan J 2020. Disaggregating lone-actor grievance-fuelled violence: Comparing lone-actor terrorists and mass murderers. Terrorism and Political Violence 34: 558–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2020.1718661

Cooper AJ, Pathé MT & McEwan TE 2022. The role of grievance in fatal family violence and implications for the construct of lone actor grievance-fuelled violence. Frontiers in Psychology 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1057719

Corner E & Taylor H 2023. Grievance-fuelled violence: Modelling the process of grievance development. Research Report no. 27. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/rr78917

Eke AW, Meloy JR, Brooks K, Jean L & Hilton NZ 2014. Threats, approach behavior, and violent recidivism among offenders who harass Canadian justice officials. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management 1(3): 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000016

Gill P, Corner E, Farnham F, Wilson S, Marchment Z, Taylor A, Taylor R & James D 2021. Predictors of varying levels of risks posed by fixated individuals to British public figures. Journal of Forensic Sciences 66: 1364–1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14708

Graham LW, Sahay KM, Rizo CF, Messing JT & Macy RJ 2021. The validity and reliability of available intimate partner homicide and reassault risk assessment tools: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence and Abuse 22(1): 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018821952

Harden J, Du J, Spencer CM & Stith SM 2019. Examining attempted and completed intimate partner homicide: A qualitative synthesis. Violence and Victims 34(6): 869–888. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-18-00128

Hulme S, Morgan A & Boxall H 2019. Domestic violence offenders, prior offending and reoffending in Australia. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 580. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti04077

Humphreys C & Healey L 2017. PAThways and Research Into Collaborative Inter-Agency practice: Collaborative work across the child protection and specialist domestic and family violence interface: Final report. Sydney: ANROWS. https://www.anrows.org.au/publication/pathways-and-research-into-collaborative-inter-agency-practice-collaborative-work-across-the-child-protection-and-specialist-domestic-and-family-violence-interface-the-patricia-project-final-report/

James DV, Farnham FR, Sukhwal S, Jones K, Carlisle J & Henley S 2016. Aggressive/intrusive behaviours, harassment and stalking of members of the United Kingdom parliament: A prevalence study and cross-national comparison. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 27(2): 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2015.1124908

James DV, Kerrigan TR, Forfar R, Farnham FR & Preston LF 2010. The Fixated Threat Assessment Centre: Preventing harm and facilitating care. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 21(4): 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789941003596981

James DV, Mullen PE, Pathé MT, Meloy JR, Farnham FR, Preston L & Darnley B 2008. Attacks on the British royal family: The role of psychotic illness. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online 36(1): 59–67

Johnson MP 2010. A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston: Northeastern University Press

McEwan TE, MacKenzie RD, Mullen PE & James DV 2012. Approach and escalation in stalking. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 23(3): 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2012.679008

Meloy JR, James DV, Mullen PE, Pathé MT, Farnham FR, Preston LF & Darnley BJ 2011. Factors associated with escalation and problematic approaches toward public figures. Journal of Forensic Sciences 56: S128S135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01574.x

Miles H & Bricknell S 2024. Homicide in Australia 2022–23. Statistical Report no. 46. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/sr77420

Mitchell M 2020. No idle threat: Precursors to action in threateners with mental illness (Doctoral thesis). Queensland University of Technology. https://doi.org/10.5204/thesis.eprints.180839

Monckton Smith J 2020. Intimate partner femicide: Using Foucauldian analysis to track an eight stage progression to homicide. Violence Against Women 26(1): 1267–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219863876

Mullen PE, Pathé MT & Purcell R 2009. Stalkers and their victimsCambridge: Cambridge University Press

Pathé MT, Lowry T, Haworth DJ, Webster DM, Mulder MJ, Winterbourne P & Briggs CJ 2015. Assessing and managing the threat posed by fixated persons in Australia. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 2(4): 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2015.1037332

Pathé MT, Lowry TJ, Haworth DJ, Winterbourne P & Day L 2016. Public figure fixation: Cautionary findings for mental health practitioners. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 34(5): 681–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2252

Pathé MT, Haworth DJ, Goodwin T, Holman AG, Amos SJ, Winterbourne P & Day L 2018. Establishing a joint agency response to the threat of lone-actor grievance-fuelled violence. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 29(1): 3752. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2017.1335762

Rahman T, Hartz SM, Xiong W, Meloy JR, Janofsky J, Harry B & Resnick PJ 2020. Extreme overvalued beliefs. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 48(3): 319326

Rahman T, Meloy JR & Bauer R 2019. Extreme overvalued belief and the legacy of Carl Wernicke. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 47(2): 118

Riddle FJ, Ferriman M, Farmer DG & Baillie KM 2019. Towards a national strategy for managing fixated persons in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 26(3): 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1506722

Scalora MJ, Baumgartner JV, Zimmerman W, Callaway D, Hatch Maillette MA, Covell CN, Palarea RE, Krebs JA & Washington DO 2002. An epidemiological assessment of problematic contacts to members of Congress. Journal of Forensic Science 47(6): 1360–1364. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS15575J

Scalora MJ, Hawthorne D, Pellicane T & Schoeneman K 2020. A glimpse of threat assessment and management activity performed by the United States Marshals Service. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management 7(1–2): 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000149

Stark E 2007. Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195154276.001.0001

Stark E & Hester M 2019. Coercive control: Update and review. Violence Against Women 25(1): 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218816191

van der Meer BB, Bootsma L & Meloy R 2012. Disturbing communications and problematic approaches to the Dutch Royal Family. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 23(5–6): 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2012.727453

van der Put CE, Gubbels J & Assink M 2019. Predicting domestic violence: A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of risk assessment tools. Aggression and Violent Behavior 47: 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.03.008