Australian Institute of Criminology

Skip to content

References

All URLs correct at March 2011

  • ACT Department of Disability, Housing and Community Services (ACT DDHCS) 2009. Community youth justice. http://www.dhcs.act.gov.au/ocyfs/services/community_youth_justice  
  • ACT Department of Justice and Community Safety (DJCS) 2008. ACT criminal justice statistical profile: March 2008 profile. Canberra: DJCS
  • Anderegg M 2006. Introduction, in Thomas D (ed), How does the juvenile justice system measure up? Applying performance measures in five jurisdictions. Pittsburgh: National Center for Juvenile Justice: 1
  • Andersson C 2003. Development of a national offence index for the ranking of offences. Paper presented at the Evaluation in Crime and Justice: Trends and Methods conference. Canberra. http://www.aic.gov.au/events/aic%20upcoming%20events/2003/~/media/conferences/evaluation/andersson.ashx  
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2010a. Criminal courts Australia 2008–09. cat. no. 4513.0. Canberra: ABS
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2010b. Table 14: Children’s courts defendants proven guilty, principal sentence by states and territories, 2006–07 and 2008–09. Canberra: ABS
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2009. National offence index, 2009. cat. no. 1234.0.55.001. Canberra: ABS
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2008. Australian Standard Offence Classification (ASOC) Australia 2008, 2nd ed. cat. no. 1234.0. Canberra: ABS
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2005. National information development plan. cat. no. 4520.0. Canberra: ABS
  • Baglivio M 2009. The assessment of rick to recidivate among a juvenile offending population. Journal of Criminal Justice 37(6): 296–607
  • Bartels L 2009. The weight of the sword of Damocles: A reconviction analysis of suspended sentences in Tasmania. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 42(1): 72–100
  • Bazemore G 2006. Performance measures: Measuring what really matters in juvenile justice. Alexandria: American Prosecutors Research Institute
  • Cecile M & Born M 2009. Intervention in juvenile delinquency: Danger of iatrogenic effects? Children and Youth Services Review 31: 1217–1221
  • Chen S, Matruglio T, Weatherburn D & Hua J 2005. The transition from juvenile to adult criminal careers. Crime and Justice Bulletin no. 86. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research
  • Cottle C, Lee R & Heilbrun K 2001. The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behaviour 28(3): 367–394
  • Cunneen C & Luke G 2007. Recidivism and the effectiveness of criminal justice interventions: Juvenile offenders and post release support. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 19(2): 197–210
  • Cunneen C & White R 2007. Juvenile justice: Youth and crime in Australia, 3rd ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press
  • Ellermann R, Sullo P & Tien J 1992. An alternative approach to modelling recidivism using quantile residual life functions. Operations Research 40(3): 485–504
  • Fagan A & Western J 2005. Escalation and deceleration of offending behaviours from adolescence to early adulthood. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 38(1): 59–76
  • Farrell J 2009. All the rights moves? Police ‘move-on’ powers in Victoria. Alternative Law Journal 34(1): 21–26
  • Farrington D 1986. Age and crime, in Tonry M & Morris N (eds), Crime and justice: An annual review of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 189–250
  • Ferrante A, Loh N & Maller M 2010. Assessing the impact of ‘available street time’ and mortality on estimates of recidivism. Technical and background paper no. 35. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current series/tbp/21-40/tbp035.aspx  
  • Ferrante A, Loh N & Maller M 2004. Pathways through justice: A statistical analysis of offender contact with the WA juvenile justice system: Final report. Perth: Crime Research Centre
  • Friendship C, Beech A & Browne A 2002. Reconviction as an outcome measure in research: A methodological note. British Journal of Criminology 42: 442–444
  • Gatti U, Tremblay R & Vitaro F 2009. Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 50(8): 991–998
  • Harp C, Bell D, Bazemore G & Thomas D 2006. Guide to developing and implementing performance measures for the juvenile justice system: A national demonstration project. Alexandria: American Prosecutors Research Institute
  • Hedderman C 2009. How not to assess probation performance: Constructing local reconviction rates. Probation Journal 56(2): 111–127
  • HM Government 2009. Making communities safer. PSA delivery agreement no. 23. London: Her Majesty’s Treasury
  • Hiscox S, Witt P & Haran S 2007. Juvenile risk assessment scale (JRAS): A predictive validity study. Journal of Psychiatry & Law 35 (Winter): 503–539
  • Howard P, Francis B, Soothill K & Humphreys L 2009. The revised Offender Group Reconviction Scale. OGRS no. 3. London: Ministry of Justice
  • Indermaur D & Roberts L 2009. Confidence in the criminal justice system. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice no. 387. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current series/tandi/381-400/tandi387.aspx  
  • Juvenile Justice Evaluation Center (JJEC) 2004. Approaches to assessing juvenile justice program performance. Program Evaluation Briefing Series no. 7. Washington, DC: Justice Research and Statistics Association, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
  • Maxwell G & Morris A 2001. Family group conferences and reoffending, in Morris A & Maxwell G (eds), Restorative justice for juveniles: Conferencing, mediation and circles. Portland: Hart Publishing: 243–263
  • McVie S 2009. Criminal careers and young people, in Barry M & McNeill F (eds), Youth offending and youth justice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers: 38–55
  • Mears P & Butts J 2008. Using performance monitoring to improve the accountability, operations, and effectiveness of juvenile justice. Criminal Justice Policy Review 19(3): 264–284
  • Ministry of Justice 2008a. New national reoffending measures—a guide. London: Ministry of Justice. http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/announcement070508b.htm  
  • Ministry of Justice 2008b. Re-offending of juveniles: New measures of re-offending 2000–2005 England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice
  • Minor K, Wells J & Angel E 2009. Recidivism among juvenile offenders following release from residential placements: Multivariate predictors and gender differences, in Phillips D (ed), Probation and parole: Current issues. Oxon: Routledge: 162–179
  • Mulder E, Brand E, Bullens R & van Marle H 2010. Risk factors for overall recidivism and severity of recidivism in serious juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology XX(X): 1–18
  • Murphey C, Musser P & Maton K 1998. Coordinated community intervention for domestic abusers: Intervention system involvement and criminal recidivism. Journal of Family Violence 13(3): 263–284
  • NSW Auditor-General 2005. Managing and measuring success: Department of Juvenile Justice. Sydney: Audit Office of New South Wales
  • NSW Department of Justice Justice (NSW DJJ) 2009. Juvenile justice corporate plan 2010–2013. Sydney: NSW DoJ. http://www.djj.nsw.gov.au/pdf_htm/publications/general/CorporatePlan2010_2013_Brochure.pdf  
  • NT Department of Justice (NT DoJ) 2009. About Correctional Services. http://www.nt.gov.au/justice/corrservices/index.shtml  
  • Payne J 2008. Youth justice in Victoria: A longitudinal study of re-contact with the criminal justice system. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology
  • Payne J 2007. Recidivism in Australia: Findings and future research. Research and public policy series no. 80. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current series/rpp/61-80/rpp80.aspx  
  • Payne J 2006. Specialty courts: Current issues and future prospects. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice no. 317. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current series/tandi/301-320/tandi317.aspx  
  • Payne J 2005. Specialty courts in Australia: Report to the Criminology Research Council. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. http://www.criminologyresearchcouncil.gov.au/reports/2005-07-payne/2005-07-payne.pdf  
  • Phoenix J 2009. Beyond risk assessment: The return of repressive welfarism? in Barry M & McNeill F (eds), Youth offending and youth justice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers: 113–131
  • Piquero A et al. 2001. Assessing the impact of exposure time and incapacitation on longitudinal trajectories of criminal offending. Journal of Adolescent Research 16(1): 54–74
  • Prentky R, Lee A, Knight R & Cerce D 1997. Recidivism rates among child molesters and rapists: A methodological analysis. Law and Human Behavior 21(6): 635–659
  • Queensland Department of Communities (Qld DoC) 2011. About youth justice. http://www.communityservices.qld.gov.au/youth/youth-justice/about/  
  • Richards K 2011. What makes juvenile offenders different from adult offenders? Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice no. 409. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current series/tandi/401-420/tandi409.aspx  
  • Richards K 2009. Juveniles’ contact with the criminal justice system in Australia. Monitoring report no. 7. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current series/mr/1-20/07.aspx  
  • Richards K & Lyneham M 2010. Juveniles in detention in Australia, 1981–2008. Monitoring reports no. 12. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current series/mr/1-20/12.aspx  
  • Schneider A 1986. Restitution and recidivism rates of juvenile offenders: Results from four experimental studies. Criminology 24(3): 533–552
  • Schwalbe C, Fraser M, Day S & Cooley V 2006. Classifying juvenile offenders according to risk of recidivism: Predicting validity, race/ethnicity, and gender. Criminal Justice and Behaviour 33(3): 305–324
  • Smith N & Jones C 2008. Monitoring trends in re-offending among adults and juvenile offenders given non-custodial sanctions. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research
  • South Australia Department for Families and Communities (SA DFC) 2008. Crime and justice. http://www.dfc.sa.gov.au/pub/default.aspx?tabid=343  
  • Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision (SCRGSP) 2009. Report on government services 2009. Canberra: Productivity Commission
  • Tasmania Department of Health and Human Services (Tasmania DHHS) nd. Youth justice services. http://www.dhhs.tas.gov.au/youth/youth_justice_services
  • Thomas D 2006. How does the juvenile justice system measure up? Applying performance measures in five jurisdictions. Pittsburgh: National Center for Juvenile Justice
  • Tresidder J, Payne J & Homel P 2009. Measuring youth justice outcomes. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology
  • Tresidder J, Homel P, Payne J & Nelson P 2007. The appropriateness of using recidivism as the principal measure of juvenile justice outcomes: A review of what the literature says (Confidential report to the Victorian Department of Human Services). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology
  • Turner N 2007. Suspended sentences in Victoria: A statistical profile. Melbourne: Sentencing Advisory Council
  • Tyson G & Hubert C 2003. Cultural differences in adolescents’ perceptions of the seriousness of delinquent behaviours. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 10(2): 316–323
  • United Nations 1990a. Convention on the rights of the child. Adopted by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm  
  • United Nations 1990b. Guidelines for the prevention of juvenile delinquency (the Riyadh guidelines). Adopted by General Assembly resolution 45/112 of 14 December 1990. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/45/a45r112.htm  
  • United Nations 1990c. United Nations rules for the protection of juveniles deprived of their liberty. Adopted by General Assembly resolution 45/113 of 14 December 1990. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/45/a45r113.htm  
  • United Nations 1985. United Nations standard minimum rules for the administration of juvenile justice (the Beijing rules). Adopted by General Assembly resolution 40/33 of 29 November 1985. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/40/a40r033.htm
  • Victorian Auditor-General 2008. Services to young offenders. Melbourne: Victorian Auditor-General’s Office
  • Victorian Department of Human Services (VDHS) 2010. Youth justice. http://www.cyf.vic.gov.au/youth-justice
  • Victorian Department of Human Services (VDHS) 2001. Recidivism among Victorian juvenile justice clients 1997–2001. Melbourne: VDHS
  • Walsh T & Taylor M 2007. ‘You’re not welcome here’: Police move-on powers and discrimination law. University of New South Wales Law Journal 30(1): 151–161
  • Watt B, Howells K & Delfabbro P 2004. Juvenile recidivism: criminal propensity, social control and social learning theories. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 11(1): 141–153
  • Wartna B 2009. Lapse into old mistakes: Measuring recidivism to help determine the rehabilitative effect of penal interventions. Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers
  • Wartna B, Blom M & Tollenaar N 2008. The WODC Recidivism Monitor. Den Haag: Research and Documentation Centre (WODC)
  • Wartna B & Nijssen L 2006a. National studies on recidivism: An inventory of large-scale recidivism research in 33 European countries. Fact sheet 2006–11. Den Haag: Research and Documentation Centre (WODC)
  • Wartna B & Nijssen L 2006b. National reconviction rates: Making international comparisons. Newsletter of the European Society of Criminology 5(3): 3, 12–14
  • Wartna B, Tollenaar N & Blom M 2005. A statistical overview of criminal recidivism of adult and juvenile offenders in the Netherlands. Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers
  • Western Australia Department of Corrective Services (WA DCS) 2010. Youth justice. http://www.correctiveservices.wa.gov.au/youth-justice/default.aspx  
  • Winokur K et al. 2005. The 2006 PAM report: A two-year analysis. Department of Juvenile Justice’s Program Accountability Measures. Tallahassee, FL: The Justice Research Centre Inc and The Florida Department of Juvenile Justice
  • Winokur K, Tollett T & Jackson S 2002. What works in juvenile justice outcome measurement—a comparison of predicted success to observed performance. Federal Probation 66(2): 50–56
  • Youth Justice Board of England and Wales 2005. ISSP: the final report. London: Youth Justice Board for England and Wales