Australian Institute of Criminology
Skip to content
Evaluation: November 2010
- Bsafe Pilot Project 2007-2010 : interim evaluation report / Elly Taylor
Women's Health Goulburn North East, 2010
- Implementation review of the Family Responsibilities Commission : final report / KPMG
FaHCSIA, Sep 2010
- Methamphetamine treatment evaluation study (MATES) : three-year outcomes from the Sydney site / Rebecca McKetin ... [et al.]
National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, 2010
- The Evaluation of Brighter Futures : NSW Community Services early intervention program / Social Policy Research Centre
NSW Community Services, 2010
Summary: The evaluation of Brighter Futures consisted of three components: results evaluation (how the program met the needs and improved outcomes for children and families), a process evaluation (administration and implementation efficiency and effectiveness) andan economic evaluation (to establish if the program offered value for money for government)
- A different kind of evidence? Looking for 'what works' in engaging young offenders / David Prior and Paul Mason
Youth justice 10(3) Dec 2010: 211-226
Summary: Discusses the disjuncture between the research and practice literatures, arguing that prevailing orthodoxies regarding what constitutes valid research evidence prevent certain questions about what works and how from being studied
- An outcome evaluation of the YouthBuild USA Offender Project / Mark A Cohen and Alex R Piquero
Youth violence and juvenile justice 8(4) Oct 2010: 373-385
Summary: Results of an evaluation of a targeted intervention program aimed at low-income, 16 to 24-year-old offenders indicate reduced recidivism and improved educational outcomes for the participants
- Community service versus electronic monitoring : what works better? Results of a randomized Trial / Martin Killias
British journal of criminology 50(6) Nov 2010: 1155-1170
Summary: A controlled experiment in Switzerland, with 240 subjects randomly assigned either to community service or to electronic monitoring, found that those assigned to electronic monitoring reoffended less than those assigned to community service, that they were more often married and lived under more favourable financial circumstances.
- Evaluating Australia's response to all forms of trafficking : towards rights-centered reform / Frances Simmons and Jennifer Burn
Australian law journal 84(10) 2010: 712-730
Summary: This article assesses Australia's response to human trafficking in light of the growing focus on trafficking outside the commercial sex industry. The authors propose updating Australia's response to trafficking to fully reflect Australia's international obligations to address trafficking, forced labour, and practices similar to slavery such as forced marriage.
- Evaluating CCTV : why the findings are inconsistent, inconclusive and ultimately irrelevant / Emmeline Taylor
Crime prevention and community safety 12(4) Oct 2010: 209-232
Summary: This article critiques the evaluation doctrine that has dominated CCTV evaluations and outlines how it has resulted in an approach that overlooks the qualitative impact of CCTV, ignores the possibility that individuals other than offenders may be affectedby the camera's gaze; and presumes that the only significant impact of CCTV (and thereby worthy of evaluating) is on crime rates.
- Getting beyond failure : promising approaches for reducing DMC
Youth violence and juvenile justice 8(3) Jul 2010: 266-276
Summary: In recent years, generous investments from private foundations (US), such as the Macarthur Foundation, the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the W. Haywood BI (Burns Institute), have led to a renewed sense of hope for success in the seemingly intractable problemof minority overrepresentation in the juvenile justice system.
- Public protection in youth justice? The Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme from the inside / Tom Ellis, Nicholas Pamment and Chris Lewis
International journal of police science and management 11(4) Dec 2009: 393-413
Summary: Suggests an alternative approach to dealing with serious and persistent offenders in the community, based on the views of the young offenders subject to the Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme and their supervisors.